Historical AI Consensus

This page preserves the research and market snapshot packaged for this batch. It is not updated with later prices or revised advisor outputs.

Symbol: SAF.PAR
Batch: 7
Published: September 20, 2026
AI Advisors: 14

Historical AI Consensus Investment Thesis

Safran (SAF) Stock Forecast and AI Rating

Deep analysis published Sep 21 2026Original pricing snapshot Sep 18 2026

Publisher

Russlan Ramdowar

12 min read

Published 1-Year and 5-Year Forecast Outlook

Forecast targets and rating

Published batch rating

BUY

Calculated from the frozen synthesized path using the same return, horizon, volatility and dividend rules as individual opinions.

2027

1-Year

NEUTRAL

€343

+6.2%+7.0% incl. dividends

2031

5-Year

BUY

€484

+49.8%+55.9% incl. dividends

Published batch insight

Aftermarket Engine Monopoly Cash Flow Outweighs Rich Valuation Headwinds

High consensus confirms that captive narrowbody propulsion aftermarket cash flows and expanding European defense backlogs will drive multi-year compounding. However, sharp divergence surrounds valuation multiples, where headline accounting distortions conceal premium duration risk that could compress during airline budget fatigue.

Deep Forecast Analysis by iPulse AI Engine

This analysis preserves the original published batch. Audit published forecasts in full transparency

Superintelligence (Anthropologist), Universal Investor (Polymath), Sherlock Holmes (Whistleblower), Elon Musk (Visionary), Warren Buffett (Value Purist), Ray Dalio (Strategist), Michael Burry (Vulture), Machiavelli (Insider), J.P. Morgan (Titan). Some archetypes run in multiple modes, resulting in 14 advisors total.

Computed on these frontier AI models

Gemini

Claude

ChatGPT

Full published thesis

Executive Summary

If you invested $10,000 in Safran at the forecast anchor (2026-09-18): $16,220 in five years versus $13,892 for S&P 500 benchmark.

Safran · Synthesized ConsensusS&P 500 benchmark

* Return is calculated incl. 0.8% net dividend yield for Safran.

Figure: Five-year synthesized consensus value path for Safran compared with S&P 500 benchmark. The path uses the synthesizer’s normalized opinion weights.

20-quarter synthesized forecastPrice targets, quarterly returns and the reasoning behind each stepView table

Frozen forecast from 18 Sept 2026. Prices in EUR; returns exclude dividends. Each quarter is compounded from the previous quarter.

Anchor: 323 EUR1-year price return: +6.20%5-year price return: +49.82%

Swipe the table horizontally to read every column.

Twenty quarterly synthesized price forecasts in EUR, with returns and rationale
Quarter	Target (EUR)	Quarter return	Total return	Forecast rationale
Q4 2026	325.23	+0.69%	+0.69%	Elevated jet fuel prices and high benchmark bond yields compress rich equity multiples, outweighing resilient civil aftermarket spares volume and active share repurchases as the first-half spare-engine delivery skew reverses.
Q1 2027	333.56	+2.56%	+3.27%	Full-year financial disclosures confirm strong underlying free cash flow exceeding four billion euros. An expanded buyback tranche and raised operational targets restore institutional buying momentum, stabilizing valuation across European industrial portfolios.
Q2 2027	338.92	+1.61%	+4.93%	Commercial flight hours expand into summer schedules, lifting CFM56 spare parts billings. Air show order visibility and initial LEAP-1B margin recognition offset ongoing sub-tier supplier casting bottlenecks and seasonal working capital build.
Q3 2027	343.01	+1.21%	+6.20%	Macroeconomic deceleration and airline capacity discipline temper discretionary maintenance spending. Strong counter-cyclical defense deliveries of M88 turbofans provide revenue insulation, keeping price action steady despite multiple resistance near cycle highs.
Q4 2027	351.95	+2.61%	+8.96%	European sovereign defense appropriations accelerate into year-end alongside steady airline flight-hour receipts. Moderating inflation expectations relieve duration pressure on premium multiples, supporting modest capital appreciation into the fiscal year close.
Q1 2028	363.83	+3.37%	+12.64%	Full-year results confirm operating profit advancing toward landmark targets, supported by pricing power across commercial overhauls. Aggressive treasury share cancellations amplify per-share cash metrics, prompting positive sell-side earnings revisions.
Q2 2028	371.11	+2.00%	+14.89%	Expanded maintenance facilities in Querétaro and Morocco absorb rising LEAP shop visits. While ramping original equipment engine deliveries slightly dilutes manufacturing margins, strong aftermarket cash collections sustain underlying equity gains.
Q3 2028	378.28	+1.93%	+17.12%	Sustained high utilization of legacy narrowbody aircraft drives high-margin secondary engine overhauls. Peak summer flight cycles generate robust operational cash conversion, counteracting minor raw material alloy cost inflation across supply chains.
Q4 2028	385.04	+1.79%	+19.21%	Achievement of multi-year operational targets and delivery of cumulative cash flow commitments validate management execution. The board authorizes a successor capital return program, prompting institutional allocators to maintain core overweight positions.
Q1 2029	395.51	+2.72%	+22.45%	Annual financial reporting demonstrates that scaling LEAP aftermarket revenue successfully counterbalances the plateau in legacy CFM56 shop visits. Net cash balance-sheet strength provides solid valuation resilience amidst broader European economic softness.
Q2 2029	402.13	+1.67%	+24.50%	Ground test progress on the open-fan RISE propulsion architecture reinforces terminal competitive moats. Concurrently, operational turnaround in aircraft interiors eliminates historical segment dilution, lifting group consolidated operating profitability.
Q3 2029	409.53	+1.84%	+26.79%	Stable international passenger traffic maintains consistent utilization across active commercial fleets. Strong proprietary spare parts billing and contractual inflation indexing protect cash flow margins against rising baseline labor and engineering expenses.
Q4 2029	418.94	+2.30%	+29.70%	Multi-year defense backlogs for Rafale fighter electronics and guided munition propulsion generate strong fourth-quarter billing. Ongoing share count reductions drive consistent per-share compounding, insulating the equity from broader market turbulence.
Q1 2030	428.89	+2.37%	+32.78%	Annual earnings confirm recurring operating profit surpassing eight billion euros. The market absorbs the transition from legacy to modern engine services with confidence, rewarding superior return on invested capital with steady accumulation.
Q2 2030	438.79	+2.31%	+35.85%	Maturing flight-hour agreements on young narrowbody fleets enter peak profit recognition windows. Normalized sub-tier manufacturing lead times lower working capital buffer requirements, releasing a fresh pulse of operational cash flow.
Q3 2030	445.02	+1.42%	+37.78%	Predictable summer commercial flight cycles sustain high shop-visit throughput across global maintenance repair networks. Counter-cyclical sovereign defense revenues protect consolidated group margins from localized macroeconomic slowing in short-haul travel corridors.
Q4 2030	454.09	+2.04%	+40.59%	Sovereign defense procurements and recurring civil services generate resilient year-end cash balances. Management outlines expanded capital distribution frameworks, prompting steady institutional buying as cash conversion consistently outperforms peer aerospace medians.
Q1 2031	464.91	+2.38%	+43.94%	Preliminary annual disclosures confirm sustained double-digit return on equity and zero net indebtedness. Long-term commercial service contract backlogs insulate earnings from cyclical noise, supporting incremental equity accumulation among long-horizon portfolios.
Q2 2031	474.34	+2.03%	+46.85%	Paris Air Show highlights next-generation propulsion milestones alongside new long-term service agreements. Superior aftermarket profitability and spare parts pricing power drive steady performance as the active fleet continues expanding.
Q3 2031	483.92	+2.02%	+49.82%	Terminal horizon cash flows reflect fully matured narrowbody aftermarket contributions alongside sustained military electronics revenue. Flawless navigation of the fleet transition cements durable per-share intrinsic value at an appropriate normalized valuation multiple.

The foundational investment case rests on an impenetrable commercial narrowbody propulsion duopoly converting into an unprecedented aftermarket cash harvest. As airframer delivery delays compel global airlines to fly legacy CFM56 airframes longer while young LEAP fleets log flight hours, captive shop-visit volumes and contractual pricing power decouple cash generation from cyclical macroeconomic volatility. Simultaneously, sovereign European defense rearmament provides non-correlated, high-margin revenue visibility. Valuation sensitivity remains the decisive analytical tension. Headline screening multiples of sixteen times earnings are distorted by non-cash IFRS currency hedging swings; underlying adjusted earnings trade closer to thirty-three times. A high-interest-rate regime imposes valuation duration risk, meaning total shareholder returns will depend on organic per-share cash compounding rather than speculative multiple expansion.

Key insights

Delayed commercial aircraft deliveries paradoxically enhance near-term cash conversion by forcing lucrative, non-discretionary shop visits on fully amortized legacy engine fleets.
Rate-per-flight-hour contracts defer accounting profit recognition, creating an artificial near-term margin drag that converts into compounding structural annuities by late decade.
Pristine net-cash solvency and customer advance financing insulate the balance sheet from refinancing shocks, enabling systematic equity retirements that accelerate per-share growth.

Deep Dive

The market views the asset as a bulletproof aerospace winner, pricing in flawless narrowbody flight-hour expansion and an effortless transition into record maintenance profitability. Sell-side consensus anchors on raised medium-term operating profit ambitions and a deceptively low headline valuation multiple. Investors assume airline maintenance demand is perfectly inelastic, brushing aside sub-tier casting bottlenecks, airline profitability compression from elevated jet fuel, and foreign exchange translation drag.

Paywalled preview begins: Deep Dive

From this section to the end-of-preview notice below, research is provided as simplified HTML text and tables. Full access provides the complete interactive interface, charts and additional datasets.

Alpha Gap & Repricing Catalysts

Where the published AI consensus diverged from the market narrative

Market narrative

Alpha gap

The crowd modestly overestimates near-term valuation support while underestimating structural cash duration. The market falls for an optical screening error: reported net income was inflated by non-cash currency hedge revaluations, masking that clean adjusted earnings trade at a premium multiple above thirty times. However, the crowd also fails to appreciate that airframe delivery delays force airlines into highly lucrative legacy overhauls, providing an earnings bridge that offsets multiple normalization.

Repricing catalyst

Consecutive financial reporting cycles through early 2027 will test operating reality against expectations. As the spare-engine delivery skew reverses and airlines digest elevated fuel expenses, reported propulsion margins will clarify underlying run-rate profitability. Proof that young engine contracts are turning cash-generative alongside steady defense execution will force consensus models to separate non-cash accounting noise from durable free cash flow conversion.

Published consensus context

Macro regime alignment

Persistent central bank monetary tightness and elevated jet fuel prices create a mixed macro regime. Higher interest rates exert duration pressure on premium equity multiples and strain customer airline balance sheets. Conversely, non-discretionary safety certifications, contractual inflation escalators, sovereign defense rearmament spending, and a pristine net cash position shield corporate operations from external credit and stagflationary shocks.

Published consensus context

Advisor disagreement

The primary debate centers on valuation reality versus headline reporting metrics. Bullish views argue the stock is cheap at sixteen times trailing earnings, projecting uninterrupted multiple expansion. Forensic analyses counter that IFRS mark-to-market currency hedge adjustments created an optical accounting illusion, masking a true adjusted multiple near thirty-three times that carries severe duration risk under five-percent bond yields. Resolving this disagreement depends on monitoring second-half propulsion margins as spare-engine delivery timing normalizes and observing whether customer airlines absorb maintenance price escalations without cutting shop-visit workscopes.

Published scenario analysis

Base-case forces, risks, and opportunities

Top drivers and tailwinds

Commercial engine aftermarket cash tollbooth: CFM International powers over seventy percent of global narrowbodies, capturing non-discretionary flight-hour maintenance. Delivery delays force airlines to extend legacy CFM56 operations, yielding high-margin time-and-materials shop visits while the expanding LEAP fleet enters initial overhauls. This installed base extracts pricing power, structurally compounding recurring cash generation over the horizon. Expected impact: +28%.
European sovereign defense rearmament surge: Geopolitical fragmentation and NATO procurement mandates accelerate sovereign defense orders across military optronics, guided missiles, and M88 turbofans for Dassault Rafale export contracts. Multi-year government backlogs provide high-visibility, non-cyclical cash flows that insulate group profitability against civil airline volatility and elevate the corporate earnings floor. Expected impact: +17%.
Narrowbody duopoly production build ramp: Despite persistent casting and forging chokepoints, multi-year single-aisle order backlogs at Airbus and Boeing drive engine assembly rates higher. Ramping original equipment deliveries expands fixed-cost absorption across propulsion hubs, while seeding thousands of additional captive powerplants for two decades of proprietary aftermarket parts consumption. Expected impact: +16%.
Disciplined self-funded share retirement compounding: Converting over eighty percent of operating income into free cash flow enables aggressive shareholder capital returns. Management consistently deploys multi-billion-euro share cancellation programs alongside growing dividends while preserving net cash solvency. This mechanical share count reduction compounds intrinsic per-share earnings growth, establishing a resilient floor against broader valuation multiple compression. Expected impact: +11%.

Top frictions and headwinds

Elevated valuation duration multiple compression: Adjusted earnings trade near thirty-three times rather than headline screen multiples, creating duration vulnerability as central bank policy rates remain restrictive. With sovereign benchmark yields elevated, premium aerospace valuation multiples face mechanical contraction toward historical medians, dampening equity returns despite solid underlying corporate cash generation. Expected impact: -15%.
Tier-two aerospace supply chain bottlenecks: Chronic shortages across specialized titanium forgings, complex castings, and aerospace labor constrain engine delivery velocity. Upstream supplier bottlenecks force buffer inventory accumulation and risk assembly delivery penalties. This operational friction traps working capital and slows original equipment margin realization until domestic forging capacity achieves full yield. Expected impact: -11%.
Airline customer margin squeeze fatigue: Elevated jet fuel prices and rising fleet financing expenses compress commercial airline operating profitability. In response to cash-flow strain, distressed carriers seek to defer discretionary heavy maintenance, harvest parts from grounded aircraft, or negotiate concessionary contract terms, temporarily moderating civil engine spare parts billing velocity. Expected impact: -9%.
Dollar currency hedging rollover drag: Commercial revenues are predominantly dollar-denominated while manufacturing costs are heavily euro-based. As favorable legacy currency hedges near 1.10–1.12 EUR/USD roll off into prevailing spot corridors, foreign exchange translation presents mechanical headwinds. Mark-to-market derivative swings under IFRS continue injecting headline earnings volatility into reported results. Expected impact: -7%.

Tail risks

Severe global air travel contraction: An acute international stagflation shock, exacerbated by sustained oil prices above $120 and geopolitical airspace closures, could trigger global commercial passenger capacity cuts. Airlines would idle narrowbody jets and defer engine overhauls, causing flight-hour billings and high-margin civil spare parts revenue to contract sharply. Probability: +24%. Expected impact: -28%.
Catastrophic LEAP fleetwide airworthiness grounding: Detection of a systemic metallurgical flaw or uncontained turbine rotor failure could trigger emergency airworthiness directives grounding significant portions of the global LEAP fleet. Beyond direct inspection outlays and heavy airline compensation liabilities, cash flow would evaporate under acute warranty claims, severely compressing valuation multiples. Probability: +17%. Expected impact: -32%.

Tail opportunities

Sovereign Rafale fighter export mega-tranche: Intensifying regional security fragmentation could trigger emergency defense appropriations, securing unexpected export contracts for over one hundred additional Rafale fighters by late 2027. Supplying twin M88 engines, optronics, and navigation suites would dramatically expand military backlog, adding high-margin sovereign earnings and prompting an institutional multiple re-rating. Probability: +34%. Expected impact: +22%.
RISE open-fan commercial platform exclusivity: CFM International's Revolutionary Innovation for Sustainable Engines demonstrator could achieve verified aerodynamic and fuel-burn breakthroughs ahead of schedule, prompting airframers to select it exclusively for mid-2030s clean-sheet aircraft. Securing an exclusive platform mandate would shut out competitors, unlocking decades of guaranteed aftermarket royalties and expanding terminal valuation. Probability: +26%. Expected impact: +27%.

What to monitor

Thesis watchpoints

-- Civil engine spare parts revenue expanding above 18% in USD across semi-annual releases confirms aftermarket pricing durability.

Key insights

Propulsion segment operating margin falling below 22% indicates unfavorable contract mix or persistent sub-tier cost inflation.
Global narrowbody flight cycles contracting over 5% consecutively requires fundamental reassessment of flight-hour service cash conversion.

Company Financial Analysis

Safran Earnings and Financials Analysis by AI

Financial figures available as of Sep 20, 2026. Only filings and source records available by this analysis date are included.

Earnings and financials

AI Review

The headline financial results show striking volatility that requires careful interpretation. While reported net income swung dramatically between fiscal 2024 and 2025 due to non-cash currency hedging adjustments under international accounting rules, underlying revenue expanded 12.5% to €31.2 billion. Commercial engine spare parts billings and expanding equipment shipments drove genuine industrial performance. Free cash flow generation proved exceptionally resilient, reaching €4.48 billion in 2025 and €2.62 billion in the first half of 2026. This cash strength validates that daily flight-hour collections decouple from paper accounting noise. The business consistently turns operational flight hours into cash, funding dividends and share buybacks.

Revenue, earnings, and cash flow

The table compares up to five fiscal years of revenue, net income, and free cash flow available to this analysis.

Revenue, net income, and free cash flow history
Fiscal year	Revenue	Net income	Free cash flow
2025	EUR 31.2B	EUR 7.2B	EUR 4.5B
2024	EUR 27.7B	EUR -667M	EUR 3.7B
2023	EUR 23.7B	EUR 3.4B	EUR 3.4B
2022	EUR 19.5B	EUR -2.5B	EUR 2.7B
2021	EUR 15.3B	EUR 43M	EUR 1.7B

Valuation context: historical P/E

The table compares up to five fiscal years of point-in-time valuation evidence available to this analysis.

Historical price-to-earnings ratios
Fiscal year	P/E	Earnings basis	Currency basis	Ticker / reporting
2025	19.1x	TTM	Native	EUR / EUR
2024	31.8x	TTM	Native	EUR / EUR
2023	14.3x	TTM	Native	EUR / EUR
2022	--	Annual	Loss-making	EUR / EUR
2021	>100x	Annual	Native	EUR / EUR

P/E uses historical market capitalization and earnings known at each period. Cross-currency observations are normalized to USD using point-in-time FX rates.

Profitability and margins

AI Review

Operating profitability demonstrates powerful structural expansion, with adjusted recurring operating margin climbing to 16.6% in 2025 and reaching 18.4% in the first half of 2026. The commercial propulsion division spearheaded this widening, logging margins of 24.5% due to robust civil spare parts sales and contractual inflation adjustments. While ramping new engine assembly initially exerts negative margin drag, the expanding fleet creates an enduring aftermarket tollbooth. As mature legacy engines undergo intensive overhauls and newer engines transition from early warranties into profitable maintenance contracts, the favorable mix shift establishes a permanently higher profitability floor across the enterprise.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of operating income and reported profitability margins.

Operating income and margin history
Fiscal year	Operating income	Operating margin	Net margin
2025	EUR 4.1B	13.3%	23.0%
2024	EUR 4.2B	15.1%	-2.4%
2023	EUR 2.8B	11.8%	14.6%
2022	EUR 2B	10.5%	-12.6%
2021	EUR 864M	5.6%	0.3%

Balance sheet and leverage

AI Review

The balance sheet is an institutional fortress characterized by structural conservatism. The company closed 2025 with a modest debt-to-equity ratio of 0.36 and exceptional interest coverage exceeding 35 times operating income. By mid-2026, cash and liquid balances comfortably exceeded gross interest-bearing liabilities, establishing a net cash position of approximately €1.7 billion. This solvency fortress shields operations from elevated central bank borrowing costs and credit market volatility. While substantial customer advance payments represent commitments to future hardware deliveries, they provide non-debt liquidity that safely funds ongoing share cancellations, regular dividend increases, and selective aerospace bolt-on acquisitions.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of debt, liquidity, net cash or debt, and current-ratio evidence.

Balance sheet leverage and liquidity history
Fiscal year	Total debt	Cash + short-term investments	Net cash / (debt)	Current ratio
2025	EUR 5.3B	EUR 6.8B	EUR 1.5B net cash	0.90x
2024	EUR 5.1B	EUR 6.8B	EUR 1.5B net cash	0.84x
2023	EUR 6.6B	EUR 6.7B	EUR 94M net cash	0.95x
2022	EUR 6.9B	EUR 6.7B	EUR 262M net debt	0.88x
2021	EUR 7.1B	EUR 5.2B	EUR 1.9B net debt	1.01x

Net debt below zero is displayed as net cash. Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities.

Capex and investment intensity

AI Review

Management exercises commendable discipline over physical capital commitments, keeping capital expenditures steady near 4.0% of revenue. Investment is strictly targeted at eliminating assembly bottlenecks, expanding maintenance shops in Mexico, Belgium, and Morocco, and funding next-generation propulsion research like the open-fan RISE engine program. This focused investment strategy preserves superior cash conversion rates without compromising manufacturing leadership. By expanding specialized maintenance capacity ahead of the impending wave of new engine overhauls, the company ensures it captures high-margin repair work for decades without overburdening the balance sheet with idle, underutilized physical facilities.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of capital expenditure and research-and-development investment.

Capital expenditure and research and development history
Fiscal year	Capital expenditure	R&D spend
2025	EUR 1.2B	EUR 1.6B
2024	EUR 1B	EUR 1.5B
2023	EUR 874M	EUR 1.4B
2022	EUR 879M	EUR 1.2B
2021	EUR 756M	EUR 838M

Immutable published data

Averaged consensus horizons

The table preserves this publication's original rating, return, and advisor-agreement measurements by forecast horizon.

Horizon	Rating	Score incl. dividends	Compounded return incl. dividends	Direction agreement	Snapshot
1Y	NEUTRAL	96	+9.4%	Not available	ORIGINAL
5Y	BUY	146	+61.7%	Not available	ORIGINAL

Averaged consensus scenarios

The table outlines the frozen bear, consensus, and bull price scenarios for each published forecast period.

Period	Date	Bear case	Consensus	Bull case	AI Advisors
+3M	December 18, 2026	310.08	328.77	335.92	14
+6M	March 18, 2027	303.88	337.98	346	14
+9M	June 18, 2027	288.68	345.68	363.3	14
+1Y	September 18, 2027	282.91	350.51	374.2	14
+15M	December 18, 2027	285.74	360.14	389.16	14
+18M	March 18, 2028	294.31	372.48	400.84	14
+21M	June 18, 2028	306.08	381.88	416.87	14
+2Y	September 18, 2028	312.21	387.72	425.21	14
+27M	December 18, 2028	321.57	396.42	442.22	14
+30M	March 18, 2029	331.22	407.17	455.49	14
+33M	June 18, 2029	341.16	416.37	469.15	14
+3Y	September 18, 2029	347.98	423.11	478.53	14
+39M	December 18, 2029	358.42	433.55	492.89	14
+42M	March 18, 2030	365.59	444.08	502.75	14
+45M	June 18, 2030	376.55	454.62	517.83	14
+4Y	September 18, 2030	384.09	461.43	528.19	14
+51M	December 18, 2030	391.77	471.11	544.03	14
+54M	March 18, 2031	399.6	482.21	554.91	14
+57M	June 18, 2031	407.59	492.77	571.56	14
+5Y	September 18, 2031	413.7	502.59	582.99	14

Frozen comparison context

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust forecast context

The benchmark definition and forecast path are frozen with this publication so future benchmark changes do not rewrite the historical comparison.

Benchmark snapshot: 761.69 on September 18, 2026

Period	Date	Bear case	Consensus	Bull case
+3M	December 18, 2026	723.6055	750.2647	769.3069
+6M	March 18, 2027	701.8973	736.44	784.693
+9M	June 18, 2027	695.1	743.3975	808.2338
+1Y	September 18, 2027	681.198	755.1476	816.3162
+15M	December 18, 2027	688.01	776.2182	840.8057
+18M	March 18, 2028	701.7702	787.1259	857.6218
+21M	June 18, 2028	722.8233	802.8344	883.3504
+2Y	September 18, 2028	730.0515	812.0465	892.1839
+27M	December 18, 2028	751.9531	839.1839	927.8713
+30M	March 18, 2029	766.9921	850.5008	946.4287
+33M	June 18, 2029	782.332	872.3935	965.3573
+3Y	September 18, 2029	790.1553	885.5111	975.0109
+39M	December 18, 2029	805.9584	909.5618	1,004.2612
+42M	March 18, 2030	822.0776	916.132	1,024.3464
+45M	June 18, 2030	830.2984	936.5109	1,055.0768
+4Y	September 18, 2030	830.2984	947.3438	1,065.6276
+51M	December 18, 2030	855.2073	969.5876	1,097.5964
+54M	March 18, 2031	872.3114	979.9863	1,119.5483
+57M	June 18, 2031	889.7577	999.6043	1,141.9393
+5Y	September 18, 2031	898.6553	1,011.7644	1,153.3587

Frozen comparison context

EURUSD.FOREX forecast context

The batch's original direct_listing_to_usd path is preserved for transparent interpretation of USD-normalized returns.

FX snapshot: 1.15 on September 18, 2026

Period	Date	Bear case	Consensus	Bull case
+3M	December 18, 2026	1.127	1.136	1.1385
+6M	March 18, 2027	1.1045	1.1255	1.1385
+9M	June 18, 2027	1.0934	1.1272	1.1499
+1Y	September 18, 2027	1.0934	1.1312	1.1614
+15M	December 18, 2027	1.1044	1.1401	1.173
+18M	March 18, 2028	1.0824	1.1452	1.1847
+21M	June 18, 2028	1.0715	1.151	1.1966
+2Y	September 18, 2028	1.0823	1.1584	1.2085
+27M	December 18, 2028	1.0931	1.1617	1.2085
+30M	March 18, 2029	1.0822	1.1694	1.2206
+33M	June 18, 2029	1.0713	1.1719	1.2328
+3Y	September 18, 2029	1.0713	1.1763	1.2328
+39M	December 18, 2029	1.0713	1.1781	1.2452
+42M	March 18, 2030	1.082	1.1832	1.2452
+45M	June 18, 2030	1.0712	1.1867	1.2576
+4Y	September 18, 2030	1.0605	1.1894	1.2699
+51M	December 18, 2030	1.0605	1.1887	1.2826
+54M	March 18, 2031	1.0711	1.1913	1.2826
+57M	June 18, 2031	1.0818	1.1971	1.2826
+5Y	September 18, 2031	1.0818	1.1964	1.2955

Behind the synthesis

How each opinion shapes the consensus

14 opinions · 100% allocated

The consensus centers on an unassailable commercial narrowbody propulsion duopoly and expanding European defense backlogs. A widespread correlated assumption among several reports is that the shares trade at a modest sixteen times trailing earnings. Forensic accounting audits disprove this: reported net income was distorted by non-cash mark-to-market currency hedges under IFRS, swinging headline figures while true adjusted earnings place the multiple above thirty times. Consequently, reports identifying this valuation reality receive the highest weights. The strongest credible contrarian case emphasizes customer airline balance-sheet strain from elevated jet fuel prices and macro tightening, which could prompt maintenance deferrals and compress high multiples before compounding reasserts itself. Unresolved uncertainties include the timing of the narrowbody production ramp, customer contract mix shifts, and sub-tier casting shortages. Allocations favor disciplined perspectives that model steady operating profit growth against gradual multiple normalization.

AI RESEARCHER

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

GPT-6 Astra

Weight14.0/100

This perspective delivers the most accurate financial reconstruction, demonstrating that clean adjusted earnings imply roughly 38 times earnings rather than sixteen. Its balanced terminal trajectory models genuine operating earnings growth counterbalanced by multiple normalization, establishing the highest analytical standard.

AI RESEARCHER

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Opus 5

Weight12.1/100

Providing superior grounded data, this report details the first-half spare-engine skew, contractual rate-75 dynamics, and duration sensitivity against five-percent benchmark bond yields. It properly balances multi-year defense and aftermarket tailwinds against realistic multiple compression, warranting heavy weighting.

AI RESEARCHER

Michael Burry AI

The Vulture

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight11.2/100

The report presents a rigorous forensic audit of customer airline health, fuel sensitivity, and headline currency distortion. It provides the strongest credible contrarian insight by demonstrating how high entry multiples and airline cash rationing can trigger near-term consolidation before compounding resumes.

AI RESEARCHER

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight9.3/100

This report provides excellent causal reasoning regarding the tension between robust operating cash flow and high entry multiples. It realistically models gradual multiple compression toward long-term medians as discount rates persist, making its conservative path economically sound and highly credible.

AI RESEARCHER

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight7.5/100

The analysis offers thorough grounded evidence across civil aerospace and sovereign defense rearmament. It accurately traces operating leverage and working capital friction. Its terminal projection is balanced, though it slightly understates the drag of customer airline fare compression, warranting an intermediate weight.

AI THINKER

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight7.5/100

This report correctly identifies the substitution mechanism where airframe delivery bottlenecks extend legacy engine maintenance utilization. Its path appropriately captures steady mid-teens operational compounding, though it is slightly too generous regarding multiple expansion during the early forecast quarters.

AI RESEARCHER

Ray Dalio AI

The Strategist

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight6.5/100

A solid macroeconomic framework connects late-cycle monetary policy and airline flight cycles to corporate earnings. It correctly emphasizes counter-cyclical defense orders and balance-sheet solvency, although its quarterly trajectory slightly underestimates the speed of initial shop-visit margin recognition.

AI THINKER

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight5.6/100

This perspective delivers a vivid thesis on the non-discretionary nature of civil aviation maintenance and defense commitments. However, it displays excessive optimism regarding assembly ramp velocity and underestimates sub-tier metallurgical inflation, justifying a moderate weighting in the composite scenario.

AI RESEARCHER

Niccolo Machiavelli AI

The Insider

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight5.6/100

This analysis accurately highlights the sovereign political shielding, French defense contracts, and duopoly pricing power. It is penalized slightly for understating starting valuation multiples due to headline reporting noise, but retained for its sharp assessment of European rearmament backlogs.

AI RESEARCHER

Sherlock Holmes AI

The Whistleblower

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight4.7/100

This report correctly identifies the accounting distortion from currency hedging derivatives and highlights the cash flow strength of older engine shop visits. However, its path models an aggressive multiple expansion that overlooks duration risk in a high-rate environment, justifying a modest allocation.

AI RESEARCHER

Elon Musk AI

The Visionary

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight4.7/100

The submission captures the physical narrowbody duopoly and regulatory flightworthiness constraints that protect aftermarket cash flows. Nevertheless, its valuation trajectory projects sustained multiple expansion that neglects broader macro liquidity tightness and airline balance-sheet pressures, limiting its analytical weight.

AI RESEARCHER

J.P. Morgan AI

The Titan

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight3.7/100

While capturing commercial aftermarket dominance and defense backlogs effectively, this view assumes near-frictionless cash compounding. It downplays tier-two casting bottlenecks, jet fuel inflation, and valuation duration sensitivity under restrictive monetary conditions, requiring a lower weighting relative to more disciplined perspectives.

AI RESEARCHER

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight3.7/100

This analysis correctly articulates the installed-base moat and share cancellation benefits, but erroneously anchors on an unadjusted trailing price-to-earnings ratio of sixteen. By overlooking non-cash derivative hedging distortions in headline figures, its margin-of-safety argument is flawed, requiring a reduced weight.

AI THINKER

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Weight3.7/100

Like other value-oriented submissions, this report relies on unadjusted financial figures that misinterpret reported accounting swings as an operational bargain. While its qualitative view of the engine tollbooth is accurate, its numerical baseline lacks audit rigor, necessitating a reduced allocation.

Skip to references

Research Provenance

References & Context

This Safran consensus analysis combines structured market evidence with independent AI-agent forecasts. External references below are limited to sources recorded by the researcher agents for this forecast batch.

Primary analysis inputs

iPulse AI Multi-Agent Forecasts — independent analyst personas, model outputs, and consensus synthesis.
iPulse AI Global Events Context — macroeconomic, geopolitical, regulatory, and industry-event context.
Structured market history — prices, distributions, volatility, identifiers, and listing metadata.
Company earnings and financial statements — revenue, profitability, balance-sheet, cash-flow, and investment trends.
Researcher web evidence — public sources consulted to challenge and contextualize the forecast thesis.

Independent AI Advisor panel

AI Advisors: 14
AI Researchers: 11
AI Thinkers: 3

Sources retained from AI Researcher searches

Asset-specific · Researcher web

Showing the top 15 of 75 deduplicated sources retained for this batch.

01EX-99.2 3 wlfc1q25presentationfina.htm EX-99.2 wlfc1q25presentationfinasec.gov
02H1 2026 RESULTS July 28, 2026 Olivier ANDRIES Chief Executive Officersafran-group.com
03Safran reports excellent financial performance in 2025 and raises its 2028 ambitions | Safransafran-group.com
04Safran reports its first-half 2026 results | Safransafran-group.com
05Safran stock falls after S&P credit upgrade and Berenberg Buy ratingad-hoc-news.de
06Safran stock gains as JPMorgan lifts price target to 460 eurosad-hoc-news.de
07Safran stock gains on JPMorgan target hike and solid 2026 momentumad-hoc-news.de
08Safran stock trades near analyst targets as sector stays in focusad-hoc-news.de
09Safran raises 2026 outlook as LEAP deliveries surge 41%aerotime.aero
10SAF Q2-2026 Earnings Call - Alpha Spreadalphaspread.com
11Safran - Company Analysis and Outlook Report 2026 (Updated)aviationoutlook.com
12Leap Aftermarket Poised For Growth | Aviation Weekaviationweek.com
13CFM secures certification for LEAP-1B durability upgradescfmaeroengines.com
14RISE Overview - CFM Internationalcfmaeroengines.com
15SAFRF Q2 FY2026 earnings call — BigGo Financefinance.biggo.com

And 60 more sources were used and retained in the batch inventory.

Context retained with this Consensus

The same public-safe market, global-event, and fundamental context supplied to the AI Advisor panel.

Global context snapshot

2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2025-12-31

This full-year context package covers the principal geopolitical, economic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and institutional developments that shaped global markets during 2025. It gives the forecasting model a chronological account of major world events together with their likely transmission into growth, inflation, interest rates, supply chains, commodities, currencies, public markets, and sector-level investment conditions.

The package also includes monthly and quarterly macroeconomic and cross-asset reference tables spanning US and international growth, central-bank policy, sovereign yields, major equity indices, foreign exchange, energy, industrial and precious metals, and digital assets. Quarterly and full-year high-impact summaries are integrated; monthly quantitative series remain working values pending final audit, and that qualification is part of the preserved context.

Top 3 market shifts from 2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context
Top 3 Market Shifts From File	Date	Status
DeepSeek shock and AI economics reset	2025-01-27	OPEN ENDED TREND
US tariff regime escalation and trade-system rupture	2025-02-01	ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Federal Reserve easing cycle after a prolonged hold	2025-09-17	ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

Representative Sources of the Context File

Federal Reserve US Bureau of Labor Statistics US Bureau of Economic Analysis US Treasury US Energy Information Administration Reuters World Associated Press World News BBC World

And more sources from the retained context package.

2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-09-20

January 1-September 20, 2026: monetary tightening, energy security, trade restrictions, AI financing and divergent growth; five leading market themes.

Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00%; ECB hike is in force and BOJ increase starts September 24. Markets through September 18, bitcoin through September 19.

Top 3 market shifts from 2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20
Top 3 Market Shifts From File	Date	Status
Renewed monetary tightening amid persistent inflation	2026-01-30	ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Iran/Hormuz conflict and wider energy-security disruption	2026-02-28	ONGOING
Tariff legal reset and strategic supply restrictions	2026-02-20	ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

Representative Sources of the Context File

Federal Reserve US Bureau of Labor Statistics European Central Bank International Monetary Fund Reuters World Associated Press World News

And more sources from the retained context package.

Fundamental context

Income statement

9 fields

depreciationAndAmortization · ebit · ebitda · grossProfit · +5 more fields

Balance sheet

12 fields

cash · commonStockSharesOutstanding · longTermDebt · netDebt · +8 more fields

Cash flow

5 fields

capitalExpenditures · dividendsPaid · freeCashFlow · salePurchaseOfStock · +1 more field

annual: 2014-12-31–2025-12-31, 12 periods; quarterly: 2023-12-31–2026-06-30, 6 periods

Currencies cited: EUR, USD (quote EUR; primary reporting EUR; converted/valuation USD).

End of the paywalled preview

The excerpt from Deep Dive to this notice is the simplified paywalled content included on this page. A signed-in, verified account with the required subscription provides the full interactive interface and the additional research, datasets and tools listed below.

Those additional materials are not included in this preview and cannot be revealed by removing its visual restrictions.

Additional with full access

Individual AI Advisor reports
- Separate investment theses, scenarios, factors, risks and opportunities
- Quarterly forecast events and supporting citations
- Published advisor configuration snapshots
Interactive research tools
- Zoomable forecast and benchmark comparisons
- Currency and dividend assumptions
- Additional datasets and eligible historical research

Explore complete public research examples

These public assets show the complete AI Consensus research. Their findings concern those assets, not this report.