14 advisor opinions Base Subscription Required
Quanta Services AI Forecast Summary
Unlock the rating distributions, return ranges and advisor comparison with a Base subscription.
Checking your access...
Browse Free Assets1 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 5 Sell All 2 Partial Sell 4 Neutral 1 Buy 2 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -24.3% to +18.9%
5 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 4 Sell All 7 Neutral 3 Buy
Returns range: from -29.0% to +69.6%
Calculated from End of Date $583.14
What do advisors disagree on
The decisive disagreement centers on the durability of peak valuation multiples versus operational compounding. Growth-oriented analyses argue that non-discretionary grid rebuilds and hyperscale interconnect scarcity justify maintaining elevated valuation multiples near thirty-five to forty times earnings. Conversely, value and macro perspectives assert that an engineering contractor with five percent margins operating under five percent sovereign yields must inevitably compress toward historical industrial medians below twenty-five times. Resolving this tension requires observing whether twenty-four-month backlog additions continue outpacing revenue burns while utility customers maintain capital expenditure allocations without state regulatory rate rejections.
Compare all 14 opinions1 Year & 5 Year ratings, targets & returns · Sorted by 5 Year price return
| Advisor | Model | Research | 1 Year | 5 Year | Full Report | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Return incl. dividends | Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Return incl. dividends | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Claude Opus 5 | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $693.30 | +18.9% | +18.9% | $988.82 | +69.6% | +70.0% | Full report | ||||
| Niccolo Machiavelli AI The Insider Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $688.73 | +18.1% | +18.2% | $961.29 | +64.8% | +65.3% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | GPT-6 Astra | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $609.07 | +4.4% | +4.5% | $839.02 | +43.9% | +44.2% | Full report | ||||
| Ray Dalio AI The Strategist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $623.16 | +6.9% | +6.9% | $789.08 | +35.3% | +35.7% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $556.76 | -4.5% | -4.5% | $770.14 | +32.1% | +32.4% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $574.52 | -1.5% | -1.4% | $734.04 | +25.9% | +26.2% | Full report | ||||
| J.P. Morgan AI The Titan Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $609.50 | +4.5% | +4.6% | $710.54 | +21.8% | +22.2% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $556.76 | -4.5% | -4.5% | $688.98 | +18.2% | +18.5% | Full report | ||||
| Sherlock Holmes AI The Whistleblower Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $610.06 | +4.6% | +4.7% | $684.58 | +17.4% | +17.7% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $568.89 | -2.4% | -2.4% | $672.27 | +15.3% | +15.6% | Full report | ||||
| Elon Musk AI The Visionary Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $610.81 | +4.7% | +4.8% | $502.88 | -13.8% | -13.5% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $529.46 | -9.2% | -9.2% | $481.67 | -17.4% | -17.2% | Full report | ||||
| Michael Burry AI The Vulture Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $441.21 | -24.3% | -24.3% | $427.84 | -26.6% | -26.4% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $574.52 | -1.5% | -1.4% | $413.79 | -29.0% | -28.9% | Full report | ||||
Prices, dates & return assumptions
1 Year and 5 Year identify the original published checkpoints. Current returns compare the dated close with each fixed target over its remaining horizon. Original quarterly tables use the publication-time anchor. Targets and observed prices share a split-adjusted basis.
Ratings use the shared volatility-adjusted calculation.
Dividend returns model a 0.05% annual net yield, reinvested over the remaining time to target.
Ranges and rating distributions use matching currencies, price bases and target dates. Missing or expired checkpoints are excluded; targets are never extrapolated. Shared frameworks and models can produce correlated opinions.
Quanta Services Stock Analysis & Forecast — Universal Investor The Polymath Framework on Claude Opus 5 Model
Universal Investor AI · The Polymath Framework
5 Year Rating
5 Year Price Return
+69.6%
Incl. net dividends
+70.0%
Framework Description & Key Record Dates
Investment Framework
The Polymath Framework: Eight-Lens Investment Analysis Framework
Analysis Framework Description: Select the lenses with the greatest explanatory power, resolve their disagreements across horizons, and connect the evidence to a consistent thesis, scenario path, and verdict.
- Ownership and value: examine economic rights, competitive advantage, capital allocation, and the price paid.
- Regimes and constraints: connect credit, liquidity, policy, demand, and physical bottlenecks to the asset.
- Innovation and adaptation: test adoption economics, AI and robotics exposure, substitution, and value capture.
- Forensics and incentives: reconcile accounting, cash conversion, dilution, governance, and missing evidence.
- Expectations and reflexivity: distinguish changes in fundamentals from changes in narratives and valuation.
- Probabilities and resilience: use base rates, competing scenarios, catalysts, and the capacity to survive the wait.
- Power and the rules of the game: assess political interests, regulatory influence, protection, and dependency.
- Industry structure and consolidation: identify pricing power, chokepoints, alliances, and the economics of integration.
- Model Producer:
- Anthropic
- Model Version:
- Claude Opus 5
- Mode Used:
- Researcher
- Input Data:
- Input records not available
- Forecast Target Date:
- Latest Known Price Date for Return Estimate Refresh:
- Forecast Published On:
- Forecast Generated On:
- Model knowledge cutoff:
- Supplied Context Data, Prices & Events Cutoff:
- Not recorded
Return calculation details
Current returns use the observed price and remaining time to the fixed published target. The quarterly table retains the original forecast anchor. Dividend-inclusive returns assume 0.05% annual net yield, reinvested until the target.
Full advisor report Chart, analysis, and sources
Quanta Services: Historical Prices & Published Forecast
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
Quanta Services: Quarterly Price Forecasts & Scenarios
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
Price targets, price returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Price returns are cumulative from the original forecast anchor dated 2026-09-18; they exclude dividends. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Price return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $656 | +3.0% | Q3 results in late October should confirm the first 765kV corridor awards entering backlog, supporting the narrative. Gains are capped by a 4.998% ten-year yield and a Fed still signalling one more hike. | |
| $682 | +7.1% | February FY2027 guidance anchors near $19 adjusted EPS, validating consensus. Full-year backlog disclosure separating organic from acquired growth is the swing factor; a clean split lifts the shares modestly into spring. | |
| $648 | +1.8% | Multiple compression bites as persistent inflation keeps policy rates elevated and long yields sticky. With no fresh catalyst between guidance and the H2 field ramp, a 38x stock gives back ground on rate mechanics alone. | |
| $693 | +8.9% | The compounding effect management flagged for H2 2027 becomes visible in reported revenue as corridor work moves into the field. Execution evidence, not narrative, drives the strongest quarter of the early horizon. | |
| $721 | +13.2% | Momentum continues as Q3 2027 beats and the 2030 plan looks increasingly stale. Offsetting drag from refinancing the legacy low-coupon notes begins appearing in interest expense guidance for 2028. | |
| $743 | +16.6% | FY2028 guidance extends mid-teens adjusted EPS growth, but the widening adjusted-to-GAAP wedge draws sell-side questions. Gains moderate as investors start discriminating between reported and economic compounding. | |
| $780 | +22.5% | A likely Investor Day reset toward materially higher 2030 targets re-anchors consensus upward. Behind-the-meter generation EPC awards, if disclosed, add a second growth vertical beyond transmission. | |
| $733 | +15.1% | US election-year policy uncertainty around federal permitting and clean-energy funding, combined with spreading state-level data-center restrictions, triggers a valuation air pocket in high-multiple electrification names. | |
| $777 | +22.0% | Post-election clarity restores the infrastructure bid. Transmission spend is bipartisan and rate-base funded, so Quanta recovers the pullback faster than policy-dependent renewables contractors. | |
| $808 | +26.9% | FY2029 guidance confirms the raised trajectory with backlog above $70 billion. Interest expense from refinanced 2.90% and 2.35% notes at roughly double the coupon trims EPS conversion slightly. | |
| $832 | +30.7% | Steady grind higher on execution. The Hyosung breaker venture begins contributing equipment margin, offering the first structural gross-margin improvement since FY2020 and partially offsetting mix dilution. | |
| $791 | +24.2% | Mid-cycle digestion: hyperscaler capex growth decelerates from extraordinary to merely strong, and the technology channel's order rate cools. A richly valued stock reprices on second-derivative disappointment. | |
| $838 | +31.6% | Utility capital plans filed for the 2030s reaffirm multi-decade transmission investment independent of data centers. Recognition that regulated rate base, not AI, underwrites 70% of revenue supports recovery. | |
| $872 | +36.9% | Approach to the 2030 plan year with adjusted EPS tracking well above the original $21.60-26.75 range, validating the lapping thesis. Multiple continues drifting toward the low thirties as growth normalizes. | |
| $898 | +41.0% | Free-cash-flow conversion approaching the targeted 55-60% of adjusted EBITDA frees capital for buybacks, adding a modest per-share tailwind absent during the 2026-2028 acquisition phase. | |
| $916 | +43.8% | Law of large numbers takes hold: revenue above $60 billion makes percentage growth harder, and the market applies a maturing-compounder multiple. Gains narrow to low single digits per quarter. | |
| $962 | +51.0% | A new long-range plan covering 2031-2035 extends the runway, citing next-wave load from electrified transport and manufacturing reshoring. Fresh targets temporarily arrest multiple compression. | |
| $990 | +55.5% | Guidance delivery remains reliable but unsurprising. The equity now trades closer to 30x forward adjusted earnings, with returns tracking earnings growth rather than rerating. | |
| $951 | +49.3% | Late-horizon consolidation as competitors expand craft-labor capacity after a decade of premium pricing, narrowing Quanta's scheduling advantage. Bid margins compress modestly and the market tests the moat premium. | |
| $989 | +55.3% | Closing period: adjusted EPS near the low thirties at roughly 30x supports a high-$900s share price, consistent with earnings compounding largely offset by the anticipated derating from 38x. |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
Quanta Services: Investment Thesis Base Case
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelThe central tension is that Quanta is an outstanding business trading at a price that already assumes it stays outstanding. The electrification cycle is real and policy-funded, the craft-labor moat is genuinely scarce, and backlog conversion should compound adjusted EPS in the low-to-mid teens annually from the FY2026 guide. But the shares capitalize that at roughly 38x adjusted and 55x GAAP with the ten-year near 5%. Base case: earnings deliver, the multiple slowly contracts toward the high twenties, and shareholders collect the difference rather than both.
- FY2026 adjusted EPS guide midpoint near $16.70; 13-15% annual compounding implies roughly $32-33 by 2031.
- Derating from about 38x to roughly 30x forward adjusted earnings still supports a high-$900s share price.
- At 152 million shares that implies near $150 billion market capitalization against plausible 2031 revenue above $60 billion.
Quanta Services: Scenarios & Signals
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBull Case
The bull case activates when management is forced to lap its own 2030 plan. If the 765kV corridor awards land as guided and behind-the-meter generation EPC converts on acceptable contract terms, 2028 revenue overshoots the Investor Day path, forcing an upward target reset that re-anchors consensus. A raised plan defends rather than compresses the multiple, and the Hyosung breaker venture adds equipment margin on top. Earnings growth and a stable multiple then compound together toward the mid-$1,300s.
Bear Case
The bear case activates when AI capex digestion meets ratepayer politics simultaneously. Hyperscaler spending pauses during 2027-2028 while state permit freezes spread beyond New York and Oregon, stalling large-load work; utilities defer discretionary corridors; backlog conversion slows just as acquisition amortization and 5.5% refinancing costs compress GAAP earnings. A single fixed-price overrun on an integrated acquisition would then confirm that scale eroded discipline, and a 38x multiple collapses toward twenty, halving the share price.
Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime: High
Greed and Fear Index: +45 / 100 (Greed)
Cycle Position: Momentum
Price action and thesis reinforcement are feeding each other.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
The crowd treats Quanta as the unavoidable toll collector on American electrification, a monopoly on schedule certainty whose backlog converts mechanically into earnings. Guidance raised to $39.3-39.7 billion of revenue and $16.45-16.95 adjusted EPS , targets of $731-785 from Piper Sandler and TD Cowen, and a 33.87x forward multiple above Engineering-R&D peers all reveal the anchoring bias: execution risk is assumed away.
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
The crowd modestly overestimates these shares, though not egregiously. Evidence: consensus capitalizes adjusted EPS at a growth multiple while ignoring that FY2026 guidance implies a $4.78 per-share gap to GAAP, roughly 41% of adjusted earnings , and that roughly $1.24 billion of 2026 acquisitions sits behind the guidance raise. The business is genuinely excellent; the price already embeds flawless conversion of a backlog that management admits is 95% not yet booked . Quality is real, margin of safety is not.
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
The Q4 2026 release and 2027 guidance in late February 2027 will force disclosure separating organic from acquired growth and showing whether 765kV corridors actually entered backlog. First observable sign of repricing: multiple compression on an in-line quarter, as the market stops paying for backlog it can no longer verify.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
Mixed, leaning headwind. Demand travels through utility rate base, which is insulated from the cycle, so revenue is largely regime-proof. Valuation is not: a 4.998% ten-year and a Fed at 3.75%-4.00% discount a 38x long-duration earnings stream harshly, while $103.87 Brent fuels the affordability politics now freezing data-center permits.
Quanta Services: Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBase-Case Forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Base-case positive forces
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRID Rebuild AS A TOLL Booth | Sector And Industry | +45% | +60% | Quanta collects a fee on every mile of transmission the US must rebuild, and the queue is only beginning. Management states roughly 95% of the 765kV and 345/500kV corridor work is still in engineering, not backlog, and enters from H2 2026 with field revenue compounding through 2027 . Total backlog already stands at $53.4 billion . Rate-base funding makes this demand policy-insulated and multi-year. |
| Linemen ARE THE REAL Chokepoint | Competitive Positioning | +20% | +18% | The binding constraint on electrification is not steel or capital but certified craft labor, and Quanta owns the largest self-perform workforce plus its own training pipeline. Utilities therefore pay for schedule certainty rather than lowest bid, which is why revenue rose 41% year over year in Q2 2026 to $9.56 billion without margin collapse . That scarcity persists through the horizon because apprenticeships take years. |
| BOLT ON Machine Widens THE MOAT | Capital Allocation | +12% | +22% | Quanta deployed roughly $1.24 billion of upfront consideration in 2026 across Phalcon, Enerfab, Percheron and PSD, buying capability rather than revenue . The pattern is consistent: acquire scarce skills, attach them to existing utility relationships, then cross-sell. This is a genuine earnings driver, though it also means reported growth is not purely organic and returns on invested capital deserve scrutiny as the deal cadence continues. |
| Owning THE 800 KV Bottleneck | Innovation And Product | +8.0% | +7.0% | The June 2026 Hyosung HICO joint venture to manufacture high-voltage and extra-high-voltage circuit breakers up to 800 kV in Pennsylvania converts a supply-chain constraint into a margin pool . Transformer and breaker lead times have been the binding delay on transmission projects; controlling domestic supply lets Quanta bid schedule guarantees competitors cannot match, and captures equipment margin previously ceded to overseas OEMs. |
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Base-case negative forces
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paying 38x FOR A Published PLAN | Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial | -30% | +0.0% | At $637 the shares carry roughly 38x the FY2026 adjusted EPS guide midpoint of $16.70 and about 55x GAAP, with the ten-year Treasury at 4.998% and the Fed at 3.75%-4.00% after a unanimous September hike. A long-duration earnings stream discounted at a structurally higher rate compresses even if execution is flawless. Expect multiple contraction toward the high-twenties to absorb much of the earnings growth. |
| Ratepayers Revolt Permits Freeze | Regulatory | -14% | -10% | New York paused discretionary permits for data centers above 50 MW in July 2026, with nearly 12 GW sitting in the NYISO queue; Oregon followed on state land in September, Arizona utilities proposed a 45% data-center rate class increase, and Texas regulators flagged interconnection pauses . Affordability politics under $103.87 Brent is the mechanism. This delays, not cancels, the large-load channel. |
| THE $478 Adjusted TO GAAP Wedge | Management And Governance | -12% | -8.0% | FY2026 guidance implies adjusted EPS of $16.45-16.95 against GAAP diluted EPS of $11.41-11.92, a gap near $4.78 per share, roughly 41% of adjusted earnings . Acquisition amortization and contingent-consideration remeasurement drive the add-back stack, and the wedge widens as the deal cadence continues. Investors capitalizing adjusted numbers at a growth multiple are paying twice for the same acquisitions. |
| Refinancing AT 55% NOT 235% | Capital Allocation | -6.0% | -6.0% | August 2026 pricing of $500 million at 4.850%, $750 million at 5.300% and $750 million at 5.550% resets the marginal cost of capital . Legacy 2.90% notes due 2030 and 2.35% notes due 2032 must be refinanced inside the horizon at roughly double the coupon. With total debt of $6.10 billion against $9.64 billion of equity , interest expense becomes a visible drag on EPS conversion. |
Risks & Opportunities
Top Risks / Downside Scenarios
Lower-probability downside scenarios outside the base-case forecast.
Unlock the risk analysis
Sign in with eligible access to read risks, opportunities and the remaining advisor reports.