14 advisor opinions Base Subscription Required
Recursion Pharmaceuticals AI Forecast Summary
Unlock the rating distributions, return ranges and advisor comparison with a Base subscription.
Checking your access...
Browse Free Assets1 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 3 Sell All 1 Partial Sell 3 Neutral 2 Buy 5 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -11.8% to +43.9%
5 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 3 Sell All 2 Partial Sell 4 Neutral 1 Buy 4 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -46.7% to +243.8%
Calculated from End of Date $3.55
What do advisors disagree on
The primary disagreement centers on the economic balance between enterprise pipeline maturation and per-share dilution. Bullish models argue that over 500 million dollars in non-dilutive partner inflows and orphan-drug pricing power will allow the company to reach commercialization without severe equity debasement, driving multi-fold re-rating. Bearish frameworks contend that trailing free cash burn of 354 million dollars mathematically guarantees massive share issuance before 2028, capping per-share gains regardless of scientific milestones. This tension will be resolved by the regulatory trial design agreed with the FDA for REC-4881 and the scale of subsequent capital raises.
Compare all 14 opinions1 Year & 5 Year ratings, targets & returns · Sorted by 5 Year price return
| Advisor | Model | Research | 1 Year | 5 Year | Full Report | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | ||||
| J.P. Morgan AI The Titan Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $4.50 | +26.7% | $12.20 | +243.8% | Full report | ||||
| Ray Dalio AI The Strategist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $5.11 | +43.9% | $10.23 | +188.3% | Full report | ||||
| Michael Burry AI The Vulture Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $4.40 | +24.0% | $7.39 | +108.0% | Full report | ||||
| Niccolo Machiavelli AI The Insider Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $4.34 | +22.3% | $7.37 | +107.7% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $4.49 | +26.5% | $6.34 | +78.6% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $3.80 | +7.2% | $4.65 | +30.9% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | GPT-6 Astra | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $3.56 | +0.2% | $4.61 | +29.9% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $3.92 | +10.4% | $4.53 | +27.6% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $3.38 | -4.7% | $4.11 | +15.9% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Claude Opus 5 | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $3.69 | +3.9% | $3.36 | -5.4% | Full report | ||||
| Sherlock Holmes AI The Whistleblower Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $3.76 | +5.9% | $3.32 | -6.3% | Full report | ||||
| Elon Musk AI The Visionary Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $3.68 | +3.7% | $2.93 | -17.4% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $3.21 | -9.7% | $2.04 | -42.5% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $3.13 | -11.8% | $1.89 | -46.7% | Full report | ||||
Prices, dates & return assumptions
1 Year and 5 Year identify the original published checkpoints. Current returns compare the dated close with each fixed target over its remaining horizon. Original quarterly tables use the publication-time anchor. Targets and observed prices share a split-adjusted basis.
Ratings use the shared volatility-adjusted calculation.
Ranges and rating distributions use matching currencies, price bases and target dates. Missing or expired checkpoints are excluded; targets are never extrapolated. Shared frameworks and models can produce correlated opinions.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals Stock Analysis & Forecast — Universal Investor The Polymath Framework on GPT-6 Astra Model
Universal Investor AI · The Polymath Framework
5 Year Rating
5 Year Price Return
+29.9%
Framework Description & Key Record Dates
Investment Framework
The Polymath Framework: Eight-Lens Investment Analysis Framework
Analysis Framework Description: Select the lenses with the greatest explanatory power, resolve their disagreements across horizons, and connect the evidence to a consistent thesis, scenario path, and verdict.
- Ownership and value: examine economic rights, competitive advantage, capital allocation, and the price paid.
- Regimes and constraints: connect credit, liquidity, policy, demand, and physical bottlenecks to the asset.
- Innovation and adaptation: test adoption economics, AI and robotics exposure, substitution, and value capture.
- Forensics and incentives: reconcile accounting, cash conversion, dilution, governance, and missing evidence.
- Expectations and reflexivity: distinguish changes in fundamentals from changes in narratives and valuation.
- Probabilities and resilience: use base rates, competing scenarios, catalysts, and the capacity to survive the wait.
- Power and the rules of the game: assess political interests, regulatory influence, protection, and dependency.
- Industry structure and consolidation: identify pricing power, chokepoints, alliances, and the economics of integration.
- Model Producer:
- OpenAI
- Model Version:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Mode Used:
- Researcher
- Input Data:
- Input records not available
- Forecast Target Date:
- Latest Known Price Date for Return Estimate Refresh:
- Forecast Published On:
- Forecast Generated On:
- Model knowledge cutoff:
- Supplied Context Data, Prices & Events Cutoff:
- Not recorded
Return calculation details
Current returns use the observed price and remaining time to the fixed published target. The quarterly table retains the original forecast anchor.
Full advisor report Chart, analysis, and sources
Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Historical Prices & Published Forecast
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the GPT-6 Astra model
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Quarterly Price Forecasts & Scenarios
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the GPT-6 Astra model
Price targets, price returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Price returns are cumulative from the original forecast anchor dated 2026-09-18; they exclude dividends. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Price return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.29 | +12.0% | November's scheduled FAP update sustains the existing efficacy signal, while regulatory discussions clarify the next development step. Clinical option value rises and crowded shorts amplify the response, although neither approval nor an inexpensive registration pathway is established. (ir.recursion.com) | |
| $3.95 | +3.0% | Investors translate the FAP development plan into enrollment, follow-up and manufacturing costs. The clinical narrative remains intact, but a more explicit funding requirement offsets scientific progress and shifts valuation attention from platform potential toward diluted per-share economics. | |
| $4.18 | +9.2% | Early safety and pharmacokinetic updates from REC-617 and REC-3565 support continued development without establishing efficacy. Portfolio breadth modestly improves risk-adjusted value, while evidence of spending discipline reassures investors that additional clinical information remains affordable. (ir.recursion.com) | |
| $3.56 | -7.2% | A substantial equity financing extends runway before liquidity becomes urgent. The transaction protects clinical execution, but its discount and expanded share count expose the difference between financing a valuable pipeline and creating attractive returns for existing shareholders. | |
| $3.84 | +0.3% | The enlarged cash buffer allows investors to refocus on REC-7735 dose escalation and FAP enrollment. Acceptable emerging tolerability preserves development options, and the removal of immediate financing uncertainty produces a partial recovery without requiring breakthrough efficacy. | |
| $3.46 | -9.8% | Annual reporting shows that broader clinical activity absorbs much of the earlier integration savings. Investors reduce estimates of financing-free runway, and the share price retreats as recurring expenditure proves more persistent than the capital-light AI narrative suggests. | |
| $3.73 | -2.5% | A projected Sanofi development milestone produces cash and external validation of candidate quality. The receipt does not establish recurring profitability, but it reduces near-term funding needs and supports higher risk-adjusted values for the remaining partnered discovery portfolio. | |
| $3.47 | -9.4% | FAP recruitment and longer-duration assessments progress more slowly than optimistic models anticipated. Additional trial time raises costs and delays potential commercialization, trimming present value even though the available evidence does not require abandonment of the program. | |
| $3.82 | -0.3% | Accumulating FAP follow-up supports persistence of the treatment effect and clarifies dosing feasibility. Investors modestly increase success probabilities, while reusable clinical infrastructure helps contain incremental costs; the repricing reflects reduced uncertainty rather than an assumed regulatory approval. | |
| $3.59 | -6.3% | Management prepares another funding tranche as registrational work becomes more expensive. Better clinical evidence supports financing access, but investors mark down per-share outcomes to incorporate additional issuance and the cash reserve required to complete the next development stage. | |
| $3.91 | +2.2% | A partnered program approaches clinical development, making future milestone economics more tangible. External capital assumes part of the downstream spending burden, and investors reward the resulting improvement in risk sharing without treating headline partner sales as Recursion revenue. | |
| $3.72 | -3.0% | Clinical supply, analytical validation and trial-support commitments increase ahead of the next FAP evidence package. These expenditures are necessary to preserve commercial potential, but they reduce cash available to equity holders and temporarily outweigh incremental pipeline progress. | |
| $4.16 | +8.7% | A projected controlled FAP evidence update supports continued registrational investment. The central hypothesis becomes more credible, lifting the asset's probability-weighted value, while unresolved long-term tolerability and endpoint requirements prevent investors from pricing a fully commercial franchise. | |
| $3.83 | -0.0% | The remaining follow-up schedule and regulatory preparation costs temper enthusiasm after the data-driven rally. Investors extend the assumed path to meaningful product cash flow, increasing the discount applied to FAP while leaving the underlying clinical thesis intact. | |
| $4.14 | +8.0% | Broader partner development activity makes collaboration receipts less dependent on a single discovery deliverable. Improved cash contribution supports a measured valuation recovery, although contractual royalty splits and continued internal research prevent the business from acquiring software-like margins. | |
| $3.89 | +1.5% | Recursion increases expenditure on registration readiness and selective commercial planning while maintaining its discovery platform. Investors resist capitalizing prospective revenue before authorization, and the widening gap between preparation costs and realized income pressures the share price. | |
| $4.28 | +11.7% | Longer-duration FAP evidence strengthens confidence that observed benefit can support a registration package. The projected improvement raises conditional approval odds and asset value, but investors continue reserving for regulatory uncertainty, additional funding and a gradual specialist-market launch. | |
| $4.11 | +7.2% | A final modeled funding tranche and accumulated stock compensation bring the ownership denominator closer to the forecast assumption. Scientific progress continues, but dilution absorbs part of the enterprise-value increase and keeps the share-price response below headline pipeline appreciation. | |
| $4.43 | +15.8% | FAP filing readiness becomes more credible, and selected oncology programs retain development value after portfolio pruning. Investors reward the concentration of resources behind stronger assets, lifting risk-adjusted equity value without assuming that commercial approval has already occurred. | |
| $4.61 | +20.4% | The market settles near the modeled balance between stronger clinical assets and a substantially larger share count. Approximately $3.7 billion of equity value supports a price near $4.61, leaving five-year shareholder appreciation modest despite substantial enterprise progress. |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Investment Thesis Base Case
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the GPT-6 Astra modelRecursion's platform produces more credible medicines, but external capital captures much of the improvement. The base case assumes continued FAP development, selective oncology progress and partner milestones, without treating approval or profitability as settled. By September 2031, my risk-adjusted valuation allocates $1.8 billion to FAP, $1.4 billion to oncology and partnerships, $0.2 billion to residual platform options and $0.3 billion to net cash. These assumptions are net of remaining development costs, not company guidance. Factor impacts are non-additive sensitivities. Modest per-share returns do not clearly compensate for greater fragility than cash-generative healthcare alternatives.
- Assume $1 billion cumulative equity funding and roughly 800 million diluted shares by September 2031, including compensation.
- At roughly $3.7 billion equity value, that denominator supports approximately $4.61 per share, not today's share-count arithmetic.
- This implies approximately 20% cumulative appreciation, or 4% annualized, despite an approximately 80% increase in aggregate equity value.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Scenarios & Signals
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the GPT-6 Astra modelBull Case
Clinical proof arrives before the funding penalty compounds. REC-4881 secures a workable registration route and ultimately approval, while differentiated oncology data attract a substantial licensing payment. Those developments replace speculative platform value with product economics and reduce the number of shares needed to finance growth. Assuming both stronger asset values and less dilution than the base case, a September 2031 price around $9–$12 becomes plausible; commercialization execution remains essential.
Bear Case
The lead medicine disappoints just as liquidity becomes binding. Weak confirmatory FAP results undermine asset value and investor confidence, while partner receipts fail to cover the laboratory's continuing expenses. Financing then occurs at distressed prices, or management sells valuable rights to preserve operations, creating a permanent per-share impairment rather than temporary volatility. Under that combined clinical and funding failure, a September 2031 price around $0.80–$1.50 is plausible despite surviving discovery programs.
Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime: High
Greed and Fear Index: -25 / 100 (Fear)
Cycle Position: Stabilization
The reset is mostly complete and price drifts toward fair value.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
RXRX trades as a clinical binary carrying an AI premium: optimistic analysts anchor to platform validation, while short sellers anchor to financing. Around the September 18 close, the reported consensus target was $7.22, yet August 31 short interest represented roughly 35% of float. This disagreement is not settled conviction; it reflects incompatible assumptions about who captures eventual discovery value. (stockanalysis.com)
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
No convincing valuation gap exists at $3.83: clinical optionality and financing risk largely offset. REC-4881 was in-licensed from Takeda; its FAP signal validates a biological hypothesis, not independently the economics of de novo AI discovery. My base model assumes roughly $1 billion eventual FAP peak sales and conditional late-stage approval odds of 60%, rather than capitalizing management's addressable-market claim. That distinction, plus future dilution, leaves insufficient prospective return to prefer RXRX over cash-generative healthcare alternatives. (ir.recursion.com)
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
A 2027 financing priced against the post-November FAP development plan is the likeliest convergence catalyst. It would force investors to compare clearer clinical asset value with the actual share count needed to fund registration. The first observable sign is upward pipeline valuations without commensurate per-share target increases.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
The September 16 Fed hike to 3.75%–4.00% puts the macro wind against RXRX through discount rates and equity-funding terms, not immediate medicine demand. Higher interest income on cash offers partial relief, but cannot offset the valuation sensitivity of distant, uncertain product cash flows. (federalreserve.gov)
Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the GPT-6 Astra modelBase-Case Forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Base-case positive forces
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fap's Treatment GAP Sustains Value | Sector And Industry | +35% | +15% | An enduring treatment gap, rather than AI branding, supports REC-4881's option value. I assign an 80% likelihood that FAP's lifelong procedural burden sustains recruitment and attractive potential reimbursement for a differentiated therapy. Observed polyp reductions support continued investment, while orphan-market concentration could eventually permit specialist commercialization without a mass-market selling infrastructure; approval is not assumed in this positive force. (ir.recursion.com) |
| Partner Milestones Finance Biological DI | Competitive Positioning | +30% | +18% | RXRX shareholders own drug rights and collaboration economics, not a software annuity. I assign an 85% likelihood that additional Sanofi and Roche milestones provide non-dilutive funding, following Genentech's first validated-target option. These payments and eventual royalties reduce Recursion's externally financed development burden; repeated partner selections can also increase the risk-adjusted value assigned to its proprietary discovery assets. (ir.recursion.com) |
| COST Discipline Extends Experimental RUN | Operational Efficiency | +22% | +18% | A smaller operating footprint gives Recursion more opportunities to produce investable evidence before refinancing. Management reduced FY2026 cash operating expense guidance to below $375 million, although some reported expense improvement reflects data-purchase timing rather than structural savings. I assign an 85% likelihood that genuine integration efficiencies persist, lowering the funding burden relative to an unrestructured business and preserving more clinical option value. (ir.recursion.com) |
| Robotics Makes Proprietary DATA Reusable | Innovation And Product | +18% | +12% | Recursion's defensible input is experimentally generated biology, not exclusive access to general-purpose AI. Its automated laboratories and reusable multimodal datasets allow successive models to interrogate previously financed experiments. I assign an 80% likelihood that this combination lowers selected discovery costs and improves candidate selection, supporting asset value and reducing expense per useful hypothesis without assuming improved clinical success rates. (recursion.com) |
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Base-case negative forces
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEW Capital Divides THE Upside | Capital Allocation | -35% | +0.0% | Enterprise progress need not become equivalent progress per share. Management's financing-free runway reaches only early 2028, well short of this forecast horizon; I assign a 95% likelihood that equity issuance and stock compensation expand the ownership denominator. Financing preserves the programs but transfers part of their eventual value to new investors, depressing existing-share returns without directly reducing company earnings. (ir.recursion.com) |
| Clinical Evidence Still Needs Controls | Regulatory | -25% | -12% | A promising single-arm result is not a registrational evidence package. The disclosed REC-4881 efficacy cohort contained only twelve evaluable patients, leaving durability, selection effects and chronic tolerability insufficiently resolved. I assign a 90% likelihood that controlled evidence and longer follow-up remain material requirements, extending expenditure and discounting timelines even if the medicine ultimately succeeds; outright clinical failure is a separate downside event. (ir.recursion.com) |
| THE Laboratory Consumes THE Runway | Operational Efficiency | -22% | -15% | Recursion's cash finances experiments; it is not a distributable valuation floor. I assign a 95% likelihood that research, data access and clinical execution continue consuming substantial cash across this horizon. Investors already pay roughly $1.49 billion above June unrestricted cash before other obligations; ongoing losses erode residual equity value unless financed experiments create risk-adjusted assets faster than cash disappears. (ir.recursion.com) |
| Partners Retain MOST Commercial Economic | Competitive Positioning | -12% | -6.0% | Partner validation comes with an economic ceiling: Recursion does not retain every dollar generated by drugs discovered through collaborations. Roche economics include royalties reaching high single digits, while Sanofi offers tiered double-digit royalties. I assign a 90% likelihood that these contractual splits constrain earnings capture, making headline downstream sales opportunities substantially larger than the cash flows attributable to RXRX shareholders. (ir.recursion.com) |
Risks & Opportunities
Top Risks / Downside Scenarios
Lower-probability downside scenarios outside the base-case forecast.
Unlock the risk analysis
Sign in with eligible access to read risks, opportunities and the remaining advisor reports.