14 advisor opinions Base Subscription Required
Texas Instruments Incorporated AI Forecast Summary
Unlock the rating distributions, return ranges and advisor comparison with a Base subscription.
Checking your access...
Browse Free Assets1 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 11 Sell All 3 Partial Sell
Returns range: from -26.2% to +0.8%
5 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 1 Sell All 7 Partial Sell 4 Neutral 2 Buy
Returns range: from -24.1% to +46.7%
Calculated from End of Date $300.52
What do advisors disagree on
The decisive disagreement across reports centers on valuation duration versus manufacturing torque. Optimistic analyses focus on 300-millimeter unit cost advantages and seventy-five to eighty-five percent operating fall-through, arguing surging cash flow will justify current valuations. Skeptical perspectives argue that trailing multiples of forty times and forward multiples of twenty-eight times cannot survive five-percent Treasury yields alongside rising fab depreciation and acquisition debt. This tension will be resolved by monitoring whether quarterly gross margins breach sixty-two percent while capital expenditure declines below three billion dollars annually.
Compare all 14 opinions1 Year & 5 Year ratings, targets & returns · Sorted by 5 Year price return
| Advisor | Model | Research | 1 Year | 5 Year | Full Report | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Return incl. dividends | Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Return incl. dividends | ||||
| J.P. Morgan AI The Titan Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $300.08 | -0.1% | +1.0% | $440.89 | +46.7% | +56.5% | Full report | ||||
| Niccolo Machiavelli AI The Insider Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $300.08 | -0.1% | +1.0% | $424.01 | +41.1% | +50.6% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $285.51 | -5.0% | -3.9% | $386.90 | +28.7% | +37.4% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Claude Opus 5 | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $302.99 | +0.8% | +2.0% | $333.07 | +10.8% | +18.3% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $245.76 | -18.2% | -17.3% | $327.14 | +8.9% | +16.2% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $245.76 | -18.2% | -17.3% | $324.03 | +7.8% | +15.1% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | GPT-6 Astra | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $250.10 | -16.8% | -15.8% | $312.68 | +4.0% | +11.0% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $277.27 | -7.7% | -6.7% | $302.04 | +0.5% | +7.2% | Full report | ||||
| Ray Dalio AI The Strategist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $228.80 | -23.9% | -23.0% | $298.43 | -0.7% | +6.0% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $261.12 | -13.1% | -12.1% | $294.12 | -2.1% | +4.4% | Full report | ||||
| Michael Burry AI The Vulture Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $221.73 | -26.2% | -25.4% | $286.60 | -4.6% | +1.8% | Full report | ||||
| Sherlock Holmes AI The Whistleblower Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $226.45 | -24.6% | -23.8% | $272.92 | -9.2% | -3.1% | Full report | ||||
| Elon Musk AI The Visionary Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $245.56 | -18.3% | -17.3% | $252.44 | -16.0% | -10.4% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $231.16 | -23.1% | -22.2% | $228.02 | -24.1% | -19.0% | Full report | ||||
Prices, dates & return assumptions
1 Year and 5 Year identify the original published checkpoints. Current returns compare the dated close with each fixed target over its remaining horizon. Original quarterly tables use the publication-time anchor. Targets and observed prices share a split-adjusted basis.
Ratings use the shared volatility-adjusted calculation.
Dividend returns model a 1.35% annual net yield, reinvested over the remaining time to target.
Ranges and rating distributions use matching currencies, price bases and target dates. Missing or expired checkpoints are excluded; targets are never extrapolated. Shared frameworks and models can produce correlated opinions.
Texas Instruments Incorporated Stock Analysis & Forecast — Universal Investor The Polymath Framework on Claude Opus 5 Model
Universal Investor AI · The Polymath Framework
5 Year Rating
5 Year Price Return
+10.8%
Incl. net dividends
+18.3%
Framework Description & Key Record Dates
Investment Framework
The Polymath Framework: Eight-Lens Investment Analysis Framework
Analysis Framework Description: Select the lenses with the greatest explanatory power, resolve their disagreements across horizons, and connect the evidence to a consistent thesis, scenario path, and verdict.
- Ownership and value: examine economic rights, competitive advantage, capital allocation, and the price paid.
- Regimes and constraints: connect credit, liquidity, policy, demand, and physical bottlenecks to the asset.
- Innovation and adaptation: test adoption economics, AI and robotics exposure, substitution, and value capture.
- Forensics and incentives: reconcile accounting, cash conversion, dilution, governance, and missing evidence.
- Expectations and reflexivity: distinguish changes in fundamentals from changes in narratives and valuation.
- Probabilities and resilience: use base rates, competing scenarios, catalysts, and the capacity to survive the wait.
- Power and the rules of the game: assess political interests, regulatory influence, protection, and dependency.
- Industry structure and consolidation: identify pricing power, chokepoints, alliances, and the economics of integration.
- Model Producer:
- Anthropic
- Model Version:
- Claude Opus 5
- Mode Used:
- Researcher
- Input Data:
- Input records not available
- Forecast Target Date:
- Latest Known Price Date for Return Estimate Refresh:
- Forecast Published On:
- Forecast Generated On:
- Model knowledge cutoff:
- Supplied Context Data, Prices & Events Cutoff:
- Not recorded
Return calculation details
Current returns use the observed price and remaining time to the fixed published target. The quarterly table retains the original forecast anchor. Dividend-inclusive returns assume 1.35% annual net yield, reinvested until the target.
Full advisor report Chart, analysis, and sources
Texas Instruments Incorporated: Historical Prices & Published Forecast
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
Texas Instruments Incorporated: Quarterly Price Forecasts & Scenarios
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
Price targets, price returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Price returns are cumulative from the original forecast anchor dated 2026-09-18; they exclude dividends. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Price return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $275 | +3.0% | Late-October Q3 results land at or above the $5.90bn midpoint with further margin expansion, confirming fall-through. Gains are capped by a 5% ten-year yield and December de-risking across expensive semiconductor multiples. | |
| $286 | +7.1% | January Q4 results and initial 2027 framing extend the upcycle narrative as industrial and automotive orders hold. Investors reward visible revenue acceleration, though ambiguity on 2027 capital expenditure limits the rerating. | |
| $291 | +9.3% | Silicon Labs closes in the first half and TI issues acquisition debt into a still-expensive investment-grade market. Synergy optimism roughly offsets higher interest expense and the continued absence of meaningful repurchases. | |
| $303 | +13.6% | Peak-cycle quarter: utilisation, firm pricing and data-center content all contribute, gross margin approaches the mid-60s, and 2028 consensus estimates rise. Momentum positioning carries the shares to their cycle high. | |
| $294 | +10.2% | First evidence of digestion appears as distributor inventories build and lead times ease with new mature-node capacity starting. The market discounts a 2028 slowdown well before revenue turns, trimming the forward multiple. | |
| $279 | +4.7% | Guidance implies sequential decline as double-ordering unwinds. With incremental fall-through working in reverse, earnings estimates drop faster than revenue and the premium multiple contracts toward the historical mid-cycle range. | |
| $268 | +0.5% | The correction deepens as industrial customers draw down buffers and Chinese analog suppliers press price in commodity power management. Silicon Labs accretion cushions but does not offset the volume decline. | |
| $263 | -1.5% | Trough conditions: revenue declines moderate while under-loaded depreciation again compresses gross margin. Buybacks resume modestly as deal debt amortises, putting a floor under the shares near book-multiple support. | |
| $268 | +0.5% | Distributor resales stabilise and the Fed finally begins easing as inflation normalises. For a high-multiple, cash-generative analog franchise the discount-rate change matters more this quarter than the earnings trajectory. | |
| $276 | +3.5% | Cycle bottom confirmed; management restores a larger repurchase programme with capital expenditure still contained. Free-cash-flow-per-share growth becomes the narrative, replacing the exhausted CHIPS-assisted headline cash-flow story. | |
| $284 | +6.6% | Early-cycle recovery in automotive electrification and factory automation lifts bookings. Operating leverage restarts from a higher revenue base, though the market now demands earnings proof before paying any premium multiple. | |
| $290 | +8.7% | Revenue growth resumes at a mid-single-digit pace and Silicon Labs synergies reach the promised $450m run-rate. Incremental gains stay modest because the multiple already discounts a normalised margin structure. | |
| $296 | +10.9% | Steady compounding: dividends grow with cash flow and the share count shrinks. Chinese competition caps pricing in commodity lines, holding gross margin in the low-60s rather than the pre-2023 high-60s. | |
| $302 | +13.1% | A fresh capital-expenditure decision arrives as utilisation tightens again. Moderate incremental spending is well received; a large new fab commitment would not be, which keeps the advance measured. | |
| $305 | +14.3% | Mid-cycle plateau. Revenue growth tracks industrial production while margin gains flatten, so the shares follow earnings rather than re-rating, with still-elevated real rates constraining the multiple. | |
| $311 | +16.5% | Data-center and electrification content growth becomes measurable in segment disclosure, nudging the structural growth estimate higher. A buyback yield near 3% adds to per-share progression through the quarter. | |
| $317 | +18.9% | Year-end positioning favours cash-returning quality as AI-infrastructure leaders digest their own capital cycles. TXN benefits from rotation flows rather than from any company-specific catalyst this quarter. | |
| $323 | +21.3% | Full-year results confirm mid-single-digit revenue growth with gross margin stabilised in the low-60s. The market pays a normalised 23-25x, consistent with steady but unspectacular appreciation. | |
| $327 | +22.5% | Late-cycle caution returns as lead times lengthen again and investors recall the 2028 correction. Earnings still rise, the multiple does not, limiting the quarter's advance to a token gain. | |
| $333 | +24.9% | Horizon close: TXN is valued as a mature cash compounder with roughly $13-14 of EPS power. Five-year shareholder return comes mostly from dividends and repurchases rather than rerating. |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
Texas Instruments Incorporated: Investment Thesis Base Case
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelThe central tension is that TXN's improvement is real, mechanical and already paid for. Depreciation from a $24bn fab programme is sunk, revenue is recovering, and 75-85% incremental fall-through converts volume straight into profit, which is precisely why the shares already trade near 28x forward earnings and 13.6x book. The base case is a strong 2027, a mid-cycle digestion through 2028 as lead-time-driven ordering unwinds, then a slower grind higher as Silicon Labs synergies land and buybacks resume. Investors collect earnings growth minus multiple compression, leaving a mid-single-digit annualised total return rather than a rerating.
- Run-rate EPS near $9.60 on Q3 guidance; base case reaches $13-14 by 2031 including Silicon Labs.
- At a normalised 23-25x, that implies roughly $320-340 per share, consistent with the projected path.
- Cross-check: $30bn revenue at 30% net margin supports about $9bn earnings across roughly 900m shares.
Texas Instruments Incorporated: Scenarios & Signals
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBull Case
The bull case activates when capex restraint and cycle strength arrive together. If 2027 capital expenditure holds near $3bn while revenue pushes toward $26-28bn, underlying free cash flow per share roughly doubles, the buyback restarts at 2015-2019 scale, and Silicon Labs synergies land ahead of plan. A shrinking share count then amplifies operating leverage, the market re-rates TXN from cyclical to compounder, and the shares clear $450 by 2031.
Bear Case
The bear case activates if 2026's lead-time squeeze proves to be double-ordering. A 2028 inventory correction would run the 75-85% fall-through in reverse, removing roughly a third of EPS, while Chinese mature-node capacity caps the pricing needed to restore margin. Debt taken for Silicon Labs then meets falling cash flow, buybacks stay suspended, and the multiple compresses toward the historical 18-20x, taking the shares below $200.
Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime: Moderate
Greed and Fear Index: +35 / 100 (Greed)
Cycle Position: Momentum
Price action and thesis reinforcement are feeding each other.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
The consensus treats TXN as a de-risked reopening trade: the capex cycle is finished, the depreciation drag has peaked, and the analog upcycle has years to run. Third-party targets clustered near $332 and above frame $267 as an entry point. The anchoring bias sits on the 2025 trough, which makes every sequential beat feel like discovery rather than plain mean reversion.
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
No convincing gap in either direction: the crowd's earnings arithmetic is broadly right, and the price already pays for it. Two offsetting errors cancel out. Bears quote 40.5x trailing, an artefact of trough earnings; the honest forward multiple on annualised Q3 guidance is near 28x. Bulls quote headline free cash flow embedding $1.6bn of CHIPS transfers while ignoring the suspended buyback. Strip both distortions and the shares sit close to fair value for a mid-cycle analog IDM, with asymmetry mildly negative.
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
The 2027 capital-expenditure disclosure, likely alongside January 2027 guidance and the annual capital-management update, is the hinge . If capex re-accelerates with revenue, the free-cash-flow-per-share story dies and the multiple compresses. The first observable sign is a widened capex range beside a still-dormant repurchase line.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
The macro wind is in its face on valuation and at its back on demand. A 5% US ten-year and a 3.75-4.00% policy rate cap what investors will pay for a 2.2% free-cash-flow yield, while resilient US industrial investment and energy-security capital spending support analog content. Thesis sensitivity runs mainly through the discount rate, not order books.
Texas Instruments Incorporated: Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBase-Case Forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Base-case positive forces
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation SUNK Revenue Arriving | Operational Efficiency | +25% | +45% | TI sank roughly $24bn into 300mm capacity through 2025, collapsing gross margin from 68.8% to 57.0% as under-loaded depreciation hit the P&L . That cost is now fixed and sunk; management guides 75-85% incremental fall-through, and Q2 2026 gross margin jumped 340 basis points sequentially to 61% . Rising utilisation mechanically converts each incremental dollar of revenue into operating profit through 2028. |
| Mature NODE Squeeze Lifts THE Whole BOOK | Sector And Industry | +20% | +35% | Q2 2026 revenue of $5.46bn rose 23% year over year, with Analog up 26%, industrial up 30% and data center doubling . Mature-node capacity is squeezed as foundries divert wafers to AI, pushing lead-time indices from 157.5 to 179.6 . Restocking plus genuine content growth in factory automation and vehicles should carry revenue toward $24-26bn into 2027 before normalising. |
| THE Reshoring Settlement PAYS RENT | Political And Geopolitical | +8.0% | +6.0% | TI is the purest US-domiciled analog IDM in an era of Section 301 replacement duties and rare-earth shipment friction. Domestic 300mm capacity converts trade policy into a sourcing preference: automotive and industrial customers de-risking Asian supply will qualify and pay for US-fab parts. CHIPS incentives already contributed $1.6bn of trailing free cash flow . The alignment persists while reshoring remains bipartisan orthodoxy. |
| Insourcing A Rival's Wafers | Capital Allocation | +7.0% | +9.0% | The $7.5bn all-cash Silicon Labs deal, targeted to close in 1H 2027, pulls a fabless competitor's TSMC and SMIC wafers into TI's under-loaded US fabs . Roughly $450m of annual manufacturing and operational savings within three years lands almost entirely as gross profit, because the marginal wafer cost in an owned, depreciated fab is small. Management expects first-full-year EPS accretion excluding transaction costs . |
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Base-case negative forces
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEAK Multiple ON Accelerating Earnings | Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial | -26% | +0.0% | At $267 the shares trade at 13.6x book and roughly 28x the annualised Q3 guidance midpoint of $2.40 EPS , against a twelve-year median near 22-24x. With Fed funds at 3.75-4.00% and the US ten-year near 5.0%, the discount rate offers no support for a premium rerating. Analog base rates are unforgiving: peak multiples into accelerating earnings compress the multiple, not the earnings. |
| China Qualifies INTO THE Commodity BOOK | Competitive Positioning | -10% | -12% | Mature-node wafer pricing fell 5-8% year over year on Chinese capacity additions, and 180nm-plus device pricing has already returned to pre-pandemic levels . TI's 2026 price increases, reportedly steep on selected SKUs , are a standing invitation to design-in substitution in commodity power management and interface. Erosion is slow because qualification cycles run years, which is why it bites 2029-2031 rather than 2027. |
| Buyback Switched OFF AT THE LOW | Capital Allocation | -8.0% | -5.0% | Repurchases collapsed to $27m in Q2 2026 from $653m in Q1 2025, precisely when the shares were cheapest, because cash is earmarked for Silicon Labs. The dividend rose only 7% in a year EPS compounded above 50% . Acquisition debt must be arranged into the most expensive investment-grade window since 2007 , and interest coverage has already fallen from 47.9x to 11.5x. |
| A Quarter OF FREE CASH FLOW IS A Subsidy | Regulatory | -5.0% | -6.0% | TI defines free cash flow to include CHIPS Act proceeds; $1.6bn of the trailing $6.5bn came from incentives, and the balance-sheet receivable fell from $1,709m to $1,404m between December 2025 and March 2026 . Underlying cash generation is roughly a quarter below the headline. As the receivable depletes, reported free-cash-flow-per-share growth decelerates even while operations improve, exposing a valuation anchored on the subsidised number. |
Risks & Opportunities
Top Risks / Downside Scenarios
Lower-probability downside scenarios outside the base-case forecast.
Unlock the risk analysis
Sign in with eligible access to read risks, opportunities and the remaining advisor reports.