Skip to main content
BigBear.ai logo
BBAI.NYSE
BigBear.ai
Information Technology · Internet Services & Infrastructure

Artificial intelligence and machine learning company providing decision intelligence solutions for defense and commercial markets.

HQ: United StatesListed: United States

AI Consensus Investment Thesis

BBAI: BigBear.ai Stock Price, Analysis & Forecast: 1 Year and 5 Year Targets

Updated Deep analysis published 12 min read
Approved by Russlan Ramdowar, Editor-in-Chief

BigBear.ai: 1-Year and 5-Year Forecast Outlook and Rating

BigBear.ai (BBAI) has an immediate Do Not Add consensus AI recommendation, based on 14 AI analysts.

  • The 1-year target is $2.40 for , with +10.60% expected return (+10.60% including net dividends) and a NEUTRAL rating.

  • The 5-year target is $1.95 for , with -10.14% expected return (-10.14% including net dividends) and a PARTIAL SELL rating.

Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026.

Dividend calculation details

Calculated net annual dividend yield: 0%. As of 2026-10-20.

Gross TTM: 0% · Two-year annualized gross: 0%.

Tax withholding assumption: 30% (US). One-off special payments are excluded.

Return estimates compound the net annual yield at a constant rate over the stated return horizon (the remaining time to the fixed target date for current returns): (1 + price return) × (1 + net annual yield)years − 1.

Targets retain their original publication dates. Returns use the dated market close and the time remaining to each fixed target date. Current ratings also require fresh quotes and analysis, with more than 90 days remaining. Past targets have no forward return. Eligibility checked .

BigBear.ai Flagship Insight

Defense Software Multiple Deflates as Relentless Dilution Erases Topline Gains

There is sharp divergence between headline AI turnaround narratives and underlying equity mechanics. While consensus acknowledges balance sheet solvency via $409.8 million in cash, persistent negative free cash flow and continuous share dilution structurally compress elevated sales multiples toward defense services reality.

How were the Investment Thesis and Forecasts created?

14 AI advisors, guided by 9 analytical frameworks, contribute to the deep analysis by iPulse AI Engine.

  • Superintelligence (Anthropologist)
  • Warren Buffett (Value Purist)
  • Universal Investor (Polymath)
  • Michael Burry (Vulture)
  • Elon Musk (Visionary)
  • Sherlock Holmes (Whistleblower)
  • Ray Dalio (Strategist)
  • J.P. Morgan (Titan)
  • Machiavelli (Insider)

Ran across these frontier AI models

  • Google Gemini 3.8 Flash
  • Anthropic Claude Opus 5
  • OpenAI GPT-6 Astra

Latest published deep-analysis batch. Audit published forecasts in full transparency

BigBear.ai: forecast questions

What is BigBear.ai (BBAI)'s 1-year price forecast?

BigBear.ai's 1-year target is $2.40 for Sept 2027. The current AI rating is NEUTRAL. The expected return from the recorded close is +10.60%, or +10.60% modeled return including net dividends. Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. The target date is fixed; this is not a new rolling forecast.

What is BigBear.ai (BBAI)'s 5-year price forecast?

BigBear.ai's 5-year target is $1.95 for Sept 2031. The current AI rating is PARTIAL SELL. The expected return from the recorded close is -10.14%, or -10.14% modeled return including net dividends. Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. The target date is fixed; this is not a new rolling forecast.

What is the return basis?

Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. These are model projections, not guaranteed future prices.

How can I compare the AI opinions and audit past BigBear.ai forecasts?

14 AI analysts contribute to this publication. AI Opinions shows individual advisor forecasts and reasoning. Forecast History preserves earlier published batches; their figures describe their original publication, not today's outlook.

How does an AI-generated forecast for BigBear.ai differ from Wall Street analyst consensus?

Wall Street consensus aggregates estimates from human analysts. For listed companies, these typically include brokerage price targets, earnings forecasts and ratings. iPulse AI's forecast for BigBear.ai is a separate AI consensus generated through its own research workflow. Different inputs, forecast dates, assumptions and weighting can therefore produce different targets.

We believe the era of investment research conducted only by human analysts is drawing to a close. Frontier models increasingly match or exceed expert work on selected professional benchmarks, including evaluations covering financial analysis. Research on multi-model synthesis also shows that combining model responses can improve on a single model's output in the tasks studied.

iPulse AI generates transparent investment research and market forecasts using a swarm of AI configurations, analytical frameworks and frontier models. The workflow applies multiple verification, challenge and synthesis layers, with selective editorial review under Russlan Ramdowar, Editor-in-Chief. Published assumptions, disagreements and past forecasts remain available so readers can inspect the reasoning and audit outcomes.

For a research cycle covering 426 assets with 14 perspectives per asset, our internal workload model estimates approximately 114,000 hours of traditional analyst work. It assumes 16 hours per individual research report, 28 hours per consensus for synthesis and validation, plus shared data preparation. Parallel AI execution allows a deep-analysis cycle across hundreds of assets to complete in up to one day. The human-hours figure is an illustrative workload estimate, rather than measured time savings. Our research methodology explains the automated workflow.

BigBear.ai: Investment Thesis Summary

Dotted terms link to the glossary; hover or focus for a preview. Browse technical terms

If you invest $10,000 in BigBear.ai at the latest market close (20 Oct 2026): $8,986 by Sept 2031 versus $13,751 for S&P 500 benchmark.

Returns use the same dated market close, fixed targets and remaining dividend period as the forecast table.

Five-year synthesized consensus forecast for BigBear.aiThe diagram shows the synthesized consensus value path for BigBear.ai, forecast milestones, and a comparison with S&P 500 benchmark. excluding any dividend yield adjustment.$10,000$12,500$15,000$8,986 (-10.14%)$13,751 (+37.51%)Latest close2026-10-202027(1Y)2028(2Y)2029(3Y)2030(4Y)2031Fixed target
BigBear.ai · ConsensusS&P 500 benchmark
Figure: Five-year synthesized consensus value path for BigBear.ai compared with S&P 500 benchmark. The path uses the synthesizer’s normalized opinion weights.

The fundamental tension centers on a decoupling between enterprise progress and per-share equity value. Management successfully mitigated insolvency risks by converting $124.6 million of convertible debt and accumulating $409.8 million in cash. However, this balance-sheet fortress was funded by expanding the share count to 479.5 million, with an open 100-million-share shelf creating persistent supply overhang. Operationally, Q2 2026 revenue rebound to $36.7 million and gross margin expansion to 32.8% reflect acquired Ask Sage software, while organic revenue fell 6%. With trailing free cash flow at negative $73.8 million, the company operates as a human-capital-intensive defense integrator rather than a scalable platform. Valuation at over 10x trailing sales must contract toward defense-IT norms of 2.5x to 3.5x.

Key insights

  • Dilution decouples growth: enterprise revenue can compound at mid-teens rates while per-share revenue stagnates under ongoing secondary issuance and incentive compensation.
  • Gross margin expansion from acquired software wrappers is systematically absorbed by elevated engineering overhead, integration costs, and compliance expenses, postponing GAAP profitability.
  • Classified facility accreditations and homeland security incumbency establish a resilient revenue floor, but defense prime gatekeepers capture lead contractor rents.
Protected research workspace

BigBear.ai: 5 Year Consensus Forecast

20 quarterly price targets, returns and rationale, with advisor range and benchmark

Forward returns are updated using the latest market close price of USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026.

Dividend calculation details

Calculated net annual dividend yield: 0%. As of 2026-10-20.

Gross TTM: 0% · Two-year annualized gross: 0%.

Tax withholding assumption: 30% (US). One-off special payments are excluded.

Return estimates compound the net annual yield at a constant rate over the stated return horizon (the remaining time to the fixed target date for current returns): (1 + price return) × (1 + net annual yield)years − 1.

The consensus target follows an expert-weighted price path synthesized from 14 AI advisor opinions. See Opinion weights and rationale for the exact allocation and reasoning.

Forecast methodology and reference values

Published targets are anchored on 18 Sept 2026 at USD 2.8. Original quarter-to-quarter target changes are retained. Forward returns use the remaining time to each fixed target date.

The pessimistic and optimistic advisor base cases are the lowest and highest published advisor base-case targets for each quarter. The advisor at either extreme can change between quarters. Benchmark values are in USD.

Scroll the table horizontally to read every column.

Twenty quarterly synthesized price forecasts in USD, with price returns, cumulative returns including net dividends and rationale; separate individual advisor range, benchmark and applicable FX forecasts
QuarterEvidence-Weighted Consensus Price PathIndividual Advisor Range & Reference Forecasts
Consensus target (USD)Forecast quarter-to-quarter price changeForward price returnForward return incl. net dividendsForecast rationalePessimistic Advisor Base Case (USD)Optimistic Advisor Base Case (USD)S&P 500 benchmark (USD)
$2.62-6.26%+20.74%+20.74%Monetary tightening and discount rate scrutiny deflate speculative multiples. Investors digest persistent cash burn and the 100-million-share shelf overhang, discounting headline contract announcements despite baseline defense procurement stability.$2.46$2.91$750
$2.49-4.97%+14.75%+14.75%Full-year 2026 reporting confirms top-line stabilization driven by Ask Sage consolidation, but operating losses remain near $90 million. Substantial share dilution tempers enthusiasm, triggering multiple contraction toward defense contractor peers.$2.09$3.09$736
$2.50+0.38%+15.21%+15.21%Incremental airport biometric deployments and task-order wins under federal vehicles provide modest commercial validation. A localized relief rally lifts sentiment, though gains are capped by high overhead and ongoing share issuance.$2.00$3.33$743
$2.40-3.96%+10.60%+10.60%Federal fiscal year-end budget debates cause contract authorization slippage. Heavy engineering overhead and selling expenses absorb gross margin gains, prompting fundamental institutional investors to de-risk holdings across unprofitable small-cap defense technology.$1.80$3.50$755
$2.31-3.92%+6.45%+6.45%Management taps the active at-the-market equity shelf to finance working capital needs. Year-end tax-loss harvesting and expanding share float overwhelm retail buying interest, driving quoted equity prices lower.$1.60$3.61$776
$2.26-2.15%+4.15%+4.15%Audited 2027 results reveal sluggish organic software growth beneath acquired lines, while free cash flow remains negative. Valuation multiples contract as analysts reject pure SaaS multiples in favor of services-heavy benchmarks.$1.41$3.86$787
$2.21-2.26%+1.84%+1.84%Classified software installations expand across joint commands, lifting high-margin licensing. Modest sequential gross profit expansion establishes a transient valuation floor, temporarily halting downward momentum across public trading venues.$1.52$4.09$803
$2.18-1.25%+0.46%+0.46%Election-cycle budgetary gridlock delays defense appropriations, slowing backlog conversion across national security accounts. Competitive pressure from defense primes squeezes subcontractor margins, reigniting downward drift across the equity base.$1.32$4.25$812
$2.08-4.47%-4.15%-4.15%Post-election appropriations unlock delayed task orders, generating a seasonal sentiment lift. However, cumulative share count expansion continues to dilute per-share asset backing, muting overall price recovery into year-end.$1.22$4.34$839
$2.09+0.08%-3.69%-3.69%Full-year 2028 disclosures demonstrate top-line growth toward $180 million, but persistent SG&A bloat prevents GAAP operating profitability. Market participants systematically align valuation multiples with low-margin government IT consulting peers.$1.11$4.55$851
$2.11+0.94%-2.76%-2.76%Commercial vision deployments across international transport gateways demonstrate cross-selling execution outside federal agencies. Incremental software licensing revenue supports a brief valuation rebound, encouraging specialized technology value allocators.$1.16$4.74$872
$2.08-1.15%-4.15%-4.15%Defense budget reprioritization slows non-priority software allocations. Revenue lumpiness resurfaces as contract renewals face extended administrative scrutiny, triggering algorithmic selling as forward growth assumptions are trimmed.$1.08$4.83$886
$2.02-2.92%-6.91%-6.91%Restructuring initiatives modestly contain administrative overhead, but ongoing stock-based compensation expands the share float. The market prices the firm strictly as a specialized hybrid defense integrator, capping upside momentum.$0.99$4.98$910
$2.02-0.01%-6.91%-6.91%Fiscal 2029 reporting indicates operating cash flow approaching neutral thresholds as Ask Sage reaches critical deployment scale. Relieved solvency fears provide fundamental price support near tangible asset value.$0.92$5.23$916
$2.01-0.34%-7.37%-7.37%Remaining ATM shelf capacity is exercised to fund autonomous edge intelligence upgrades. The influx of newly registered common shares dilutes per-share economics, offsetting positive operational news releases.$0.98$5.33$937
$2.00-0.71%-7.83%-7.83%Sustained biometric border maintenance billings deliver predictable baseline cash generation. Stable federal procurement cushions operations, establishing an orderly trading range supported by remaining balance sheet cash reserves.$0.93$5.28$947
$1.96-1.84%-9.68%-9.68%Macroeconomic stabilization and steady defense IT spending cap downside volatility, though lack of proprietary foundational model scale prevents multiple expansion. Trading volume subsides into seasonal portfolio rebalancing.$0.89$5.43$970
$1.96-0.16%-9.68%-9.68%Full-year 2030 statements confirm revenue crossing $220 million with slender operating margins. Growth funds exit toward higher-margin enterprise software platforms, leaving the equity anchored to low single-digit multiples.$0.87$5.65$980
$1.96+0.26%-9.68%-9.68%Predictable software maintenance renewals and cost-containment measures support modest operational stability. The enterprise generates sufficient cash to self-fund maintenance, removing distressed discounts while per-share progress remains subdued.$0.86$5.77$1,000
$1.95-0.56%-10.14%-10.14%The five-year forecast horizon concludes with equity valuation fully synchronized to normalized defense contractor economics. Top-line expansion is counterbalanced by historical dilution, leaving shares grounded at intrinsic replacement value.$0.82$5.88$1,012
Show remaining 18 quarters

All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.

BigBear.ai Stock Analysis & Scenarios Deep Dive

BigBear.ai: Alpha Gap & Repricing Catalysts

Market Narrative

What does the market currently expect? The retail market and speculative momentum traders view the company as an undervalued pure-play defense artificial intelligence disruptor positioned to emulate Palantir. This public narrative anchors heavily on headline sovereign defense spending, recent airport biometric wins, and the optical elimination of convertible debt. The crowd mistakenly treats acquired consulting billings as scalable software subscriptions, while overlooking chronic negative free cash flow and severe per-share share count expansion.

Alpha Gap

What is the biggest difference between market expectations and our AI forecasts? The crowd materially overestimates intrinsic equity value, creating marked overpricing. The market's central blind spot is confusing balance-sheet restructuring with commercial software dominion. Extinguishing debt eliminated default risk but flooded the float with 479.5 million shares, causing revenue per share to collapse by over 70%. Furthermore, Q2 2026 top-line growth was entirely inorganic, concealing a 6% organic contraction. Trading at over 10x sales for a negative-cash-flow government integrator ensures severe multiple compression toward realistic contractor benchmarks.

Repricing Catalyst

What could make the market recognize and close that gap? Successive audited financial releases across 2027 will shatter software turnaround assumptions when organic revenue growth stalls and quarterly cash burn persists above $15 million. Repricing will accelerate when management actively draws down its 100-million-share shelf facility to fund operating deficits. The tangible dilution and inability to show operating leverage will force institutional models to rebase valuations from speculative software multiples toward standard defense services multiples.

BigBear.ai: Sentiment and Timing

What do sentiment, volatility, and the market-recognition cycle suggest about the thesis timing?

Greed and Fear Sentiment
Fear
Volatility Regime
High Erratic
Convergence Cycle Position
Reversal

Sentiment assessments agree that speculative AI euphoria is reversing as discount rates expose chronic cash burn. The primary tension lies between contrarians expecting imminent short-squeeze stabilization and fundamental bears projecting relentless multiple deflation driven by continuous secondary equity dilution.

Macro Regime Fit

Does the current market environment support the thesis? The prevailing macro backdrop of Federal Reserve policy rates near 4.00% and benchmark Treasury yields near 5.00% creates a severe valuation headwind. High discount rates penalize unprofitable duration assets trading at double-digit price-to-sales ratios. Although expanding national security budgets provide a resilient procurement floor, elevated capital costs and persistent cleared-labor inflation aggressively compress speculative small-cap valuation multiples.

Advisor Disagreement

What do our AI Advisors disagree about most? The decisive disagreement centers on whether the Ask Sage and Pangiam acquisitions represent a structural pivot toward high-margin software or an optical illusion masking sub-scale consulting economics. Bullish perspectives argue that accredited classified enclaves create insurmountable regulatory moats that will drive gross margins past 40% and unlock rapid cash break-even. In contrast, bearish and disciplined consensus analyses emphasize that organic revenue contracted 6% in Q2 2026, while ongoing cash burn of $73.8 million necessitates continuous share printing under the 100-million shelf. This debate will resolve when fiscal 2027 audited statements demonstrate whether organic software revenue can scale without accelerating administrative overhead.

BigBear.ai: Critical Influencing Factors

Near-certain positive forcesTop Drivers & Tailwinds

Near-certain forces that support the investment thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Drivers & Tailwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Driver / TailwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Federal defense AI procurement expansionSector And Industry+22%+34%Geopolitical fragmentation and Pentagon modernization initiatives drive sustained appropriations toward tactical decision support and autonomous command architectures. Active prime vehicles including Army GFIM-OE and Navy SeaPort-NxG secure baseline defense revenue. This non-discretionary federal spending stream protects core operations from commercial software churn, providing visible contract backlog expansion across the five-year forecast horizon.
Ask Sage sovereign AI software mixInnovation And Product+18%+32%Integrating Ask Sage introduces FedRAMP-accredited generative software capable of operating within classified, air-gapped defense enclaves. Delivering software licenses rather than pass-through integration hours expands gross margins from historic mid-20% ranges toward 33-35%. This transition improves contract unit economics and establishes high switching costs, shielding recurring government software billings from civilian competition.
Homeland border biometric screening rolloutCompetitive Positioning+15%+22%Mandates across Customs and Border Protection accelerate the deployment of Pangiam computer-vision screening at major transit hubs. Operational installations across international gateways provide recurring subscription and maintenance revenues. This commercial identity verification footprint diversifies billings away from purely military appropriations, strengthening gross margins and improving visibility through multi-year institutional screening renewals.
Balance sheet recapitalization liquidity runwayCapital Allocation+12%+14%Converting senior notes eliminated over $124 million in debt, leaving funded obligations under $18 million alongside $409.8 million in cash. This balance-sheet transformation removes near-term insolvency risks, eliminating debt-distress discounting. The liquidity buffer grants management roughly four years of operational runway to execute product integration without seeking punitive high-yield debt financing.

Near-certain negative forcesTop Frictions & Headwinds

Near-certain forces that could slow, cap, or damage the thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.

Scroll to view all columns

Top Frictions & Headwinds with asset-specific estimated impacts and thesis rationale
Friction / HeadwindCategoryEst. stock-price impactEst. earnings impactWhy it matters
Persistent share dilution from shelfCapital Allocation-35%-10%Aggressive equity issuance expanded common shares from under 150 million to 479.5 million, while an active 100-million-share shelf creates permanent supply overhang. Using equity to fund operating deficits systematically reduces revenue per share and book value. This persistent supply dilutes residual shareholder claims, placing an impenetrable ceiling on equity appreciation despite nominal sales gains.
Extreme valuation multiple deflationary compressionMacroeconomic And Macrofinancial-32%-5.0%Trading at over 10x sales while generating negative $73.8 million in free cash flow leaves the stock precariously overvalued against defense IT peers trading below 2x sales. Elevated interest rates near 4.00% penalize unhedged, negative-cash-flow duration. As speculative hype normalizes, relentless multiple compression toward government contractor benchmarks exerts severe gravitational drag on share prices.
Structural operating cash burn persistenceOperational Efficiency-26%-35%Despite software marketing, operations remain heavily dependent on expensive cleared engineering labor, with cost of revenues absorbing roughly 67% of gross billings. Operating expenses exceed gross profit by threefold, while TTM operating losses stand at $95.9 million. Without proprietary platform scalability, corporate overhead continually consumes gross profits, delaying GAAP operating self-sufficiency beyond the forecast horizon.
Subcontractor subordination to defense primesCompetitive Positioning-18%-24%Entrenched defense conglomerates and well-capitalized software competitors like Palantir dominate flagship command-and-control programs. Lacking sovereign scale and massive lobbying apparatuses, the company is frequently relegated to lower-margin subcontractor roles. This subordinate position restricts pricing power on contract recompetes, subjects deliveries to prime-contractor margin squeezes, and constricts long-term pipeline conversion.

BigBear.ai: What Could Break or Accelerate the Thesis

Event Risk Score: Very High 94/100Asset-level relative pressure from clustered consensus frictions and tail risks. This is not the probability or risk score of an individual force.

Plausible downside scenariosTail Risks

Tail yet plausible downside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail risks with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactWhy plausible / what changes
Catastrophic goodwill impairment and restructuring32%-55%Deteriorating financial returns from Pangiam and Ask Sage acquisitions force auditors to mandate massive impairment write-downs against more than $500 million in capitalized intangibles by 2028. Triggered by persistent operating losses and slowing seat expansion, this forensic purge would eviscerate reported common equity, shatter fundamental credibility, and force distressed dilutive recapitalizations at penny-stock valuations.
Flagship federal contract cancellation or defunding28%-50%The Department of the Army or a major intelligence customer cancels or deobligates core task orders under the GFIM-OE framework following federal austerity reviews. Triggered by government efficiency initiatives by late 2027, losing this sole-source anchor vehicle would erase over 25% of forward revenue visibility, causing unabsorbed engineering overhead to accelerate cash burn toward distress levels.

Plausible upside scenariosTail Opportunities

Tail yet plausible upside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.

Scroll to view all columns

Tail opportunities with plausibility, asset-specific potential impact and scenario rationale
Tail scenarioChance of OccurringStock Price ImpactWhy plausible / what changes
Landmark TSA enterprise biometric prime award24%+85%The Transportation Security Administration awards the company an exclusive multi-year prime contract exceeding $750 million to modernize domestic aviation checkpoint screening. Triggered by federal statutory travel automation mandates by 2028, this award leverages Pangiam's accredited algorithms. The win would triple annual revenues, convert structural cash burn into positive operating leverage, and prompt an institutional re-rating toward defense infrastructure multiples.
Strategic buyout by defense conglomerate22%+60%A tier-one aerospace and defense prime launches a full acquisition tender at a substantial control premium to capture accredited CMMC Level 2 enclaves and Ask Sage generative workflows. Triggered by an urgent mandate to internalize classified edge AI by late 2028, this transaction eliminates standalone cash-burn risks and crystallizes instant value above cash reserves.

Company Financial AnalysisBigBear.ai: Earnings and Financials Analysis by AI

Financial figures available as of Sep 20, 2026. Only filings and source records available by this analysis date are included. View latest BigBear.ai financials here.

Earnings and financials

The latest results show a business working hard to stabilize after severe contract cutbacks. After revenue dropped over 19% in 2025 to $128 million due to expiring Army contracts, second-quarter 2026 revenue rose 13% to $36.7 million. However, this recovery was largely purchased rather than built, coming almost entirely from newly acquired Ask Sage software. Excluding acquisitions, underlying legacy sales actually contracted. Beneath the stabilized sales headlines, true earnings remain deeply negative. The company lost $28.6 million from operations in the second quarter, while burning nearly $74 million in free cash flow over the trailing twelve months. High spending on administrative overhead and integration continues to swallow gross profits, leaving positive cash generation distant.

Revenue, earnings, and cash flow

The table compares up to five fiscal years of revenue, net income, and free cash flow available to this analysis.

Revenue, net income, and free cash flow history
Fiscal yearRevenueNet incomeFree cash flow
2025USD 127.7MUSD -293.9MUSD -46.3M
2024USD 158.2MUSD -295.5MUSD -49.2M
2023USD 155.2MUSD -70.7MUSD -22.1M
2022USD 155MUSD -111.4MUSD -49.7M
2021USD 145.6MUSD -123.6MUSD -20.4M

Valuation context: historical P/E

The table compares up to five fiscal years of point-in-time valuation evidence available to this analysis.

Historical price-to-earnings ratios
Fiscal yearP/EEarnings basisCurrency basisTicker / reporting
2025--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2024--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2023--TTMLoss-makingUSD / USD
2022--AnnualLoss-makingUSD / USD
2021--AnnualLoss-makingUSD / USD

P/E uses historical market capitalization and earnings known at each period. Cross-currency observations are normalized to USD using point-in-time FX rates.

Profitability and margins

Profit margins tell two completely different stories depending on which line you examine. Gross margin improved nicely to 32.8% in the second quarter of 2026, rising from 25% a year earlier. This improvement reflects the arrival of higher-margin Ask Sage software licenses, which generate better profit per dollar than older, labor-heavy government staffing contracts. Unfortunately, operating margins remain deep in the red at negative 77% for the quarter. Running a defense company requires substantial administrative, security clearance, and sales expenses that completely wipe out gross profit. Until high-margin software sales grow large enough to absorb fixed corporate overhead, overall profit margins will remain severely depressed.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of operating income and reported profitability margins.

Operating income and margin history
Fiscal yearOperating incomeOperating marginNet margin
2025USD -83.4M-65.3%-230.2%
2024USD -133.4M-84.3%-186.8%
2023USD -39M-25.2%-45.5%
2022USD -110.5M-71.3%-71.8%
2021USD -78.5M-53.9%-84.9%

Balance sheet and leverage

The balance sheet looks remarkably healthy on the surface following a major debt restructuring in early 2026. Management eliminated over $124 million of convertible debt by turning it into common stock, leaving funded debt at under $18 million. By selling additional shares, the company accumulated roughly $410 million in cash and investments, providing about four years of operating safety. However, this newfound safety came at a high price for existing shareholders. Converting debt and issuing stock quadrupled the share count to nearly 480 million shares, permanently diluting ownership. Furthermore, more than half of the company's reported assets consist of vulnerable goodwill from acquisitions, which could face future accounting write-downs if software growth slows.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of debt, liquidity, net cash or debt, and current-ratio evidence.

Balance sheet leverage and liquidity history
Fiscal yearTotal debtCash + short-term investmentsReported net cash / (debt)Debt less (cash + short-term investments), calculatedCurrent ratio
2025USD 24.3MUSD 87.1MUSD 62.8M net cashUSD -62.8M1.78x
2024USD 146.4MUSD 50.1MUSD 96.3M net debtUSD 96.3M0.46x
2023USD 200.6MUSD 32.6MUSD 168M net debtUSD 168M0.93x
2022USD 200.3MUSD 12.6MUSD 187.6M net debtUSD 187.6M1.52x
2021USD 194.6MUSD 68.9MUSD 125.7M net debtUSD 125.7M2.94x

Reported net debt retains the source definition, which can deduct cash alone. Cash plus short-term investments is broader liquidity; the separately calculated column subtracts that full amount from total debt for the same fiscal period and currency. Reported net debt below zero is displayed as net cash. Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities.

Capex and investment intensity

Management spends very little money on physical buildings or equipment, keeping traditional capital expenditures near 3% of revenue. Instead, the company channels its investment dollars into buying outside businesses and funding software research. The pivotal move was spending over $250 million to acquire Ask Sage, attempting to buy classified software capabilities that would otherwise take years to develop. While buying pre-certified software helps avoid government certification delays, it introduces heavy integration burdens and non-cash amortization expenses. Spending on internal research and development has climbed above $7 million per quarter. These investments commit substantial liquid cash to software development without guaranteeing that future contract revenues will cover the costs.

The table compares up to five fiscal years of capital expenditure and research-and-development investment.

Capital expenditure and research and development history
Fiscal yearCapital expenditureR&D spend
2025USD 4.4MUSD 16.8M
2024USD 11.1MUSD 10.9M
2023USD 3.8MUSD 5M
2022USD 769KUSD 8.4M
2021USD 645KUSD 6M

Behind the synthesisBigBear.ai: How Each Individual AI Forecaster Opinion Shapes the Global Consensus

14 opinions · 100% allocated

This publication’s recorded synthesis allocated voting influence across 14 advisor opinions. The weights and rationales below are retained from that synthesis.

The independently supported consensus pattern establishes that the enterprise successfully neutralized near-term bankruptcy risk by converting $124.6 million of convertible notes and accumulating $409.8 million in cash. However, this balance-sheet rehabilitation was purchased via aggressive equity dilution that expanded common shares to 479.5 million, with an active shelf facility threatening further supply. Operationally, Q2 2026 revenue rebound to $36.7 million and gross margin expansion to 32.8% were inorganic, driven by the Ask Sage consolidation, while legacy sales contracted 6% and trailing free cash flow burned negative $73.8 million. The strongest contrarian case posits that political leadership and sovereign AI accreditations will ignite pure software operating leverage; this claim collapses under scrutiny because high-touch defense integration and swelling administrative overhead consume gross profits. Relative weights heavily favor rigorous filings-based analyses documenting unit-of-account per-share dilution, while heavily downweighting unevidenced hypergrowth or premature insolvency claims.

All 14 opinions
AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

OpenAI GPT-6 Astra · 2026-09-03 release

Weight: 16.0%

Exceptional evidentiary rigor supported by SEC filings and DoD comptroller releases. It isolates that legacy revenue contracted 6% once excluding Ask Sage, demonstrates that interest rate hikes compound duration penalties on 10.2x sales, and articulates why cash protects solvency without validating an inflated enterprise multiple.

AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Anthropic Claude Opus 5 · 2026-07-24 release

Weight: 16.0%

Outstanding factual accuracy using Form 10-Q and 424B5 filings. It cleanly demonstrates the unit-of-account blind spot: enterprise revenue can compound at 15% while per-share value erodes under 479.5 million shares and open shelves, anchoring realistic valuation around net tangible book and rerated software multiples.

AI RESEARCHER
Sherlock Holmes AI advisor icon

Sherlock Holmes AI

The Whistleblower

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 10.0%

This report provides balanced forensic accounting, acknowledging the $410 million liquidity buffer while identifying the valuation ceiling imposed by share dilution. It anchors realistic defense-IT multiple deflation from 10.2x toward 3.5x sales, recognizing that inorganic Ask Sage additions cannot fully offset high general and administrative cost drag.

AI RESEARCHER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 9.0%

This analysis provides a clear bridge between federal programmatic tailwinds and the per-share dilution arithmetic. It accurately notes the 70% collapse in revenue per share despite top-line expansion, correctly identifying that ongoing ATM issuance caps equity appreciation across the five-year horizon.

AI RESEARCHER
J.P. Morgan AI advisor icon

J.P. Morgan AI

The Titan

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 9.0%

Presents a balanced, institutional appraisal of defense vassal dynamics, where tier-one primes capture superior economics while the company absorbs subcontractor risks. It accurately models multiple compression toward 4.5x sales and accounts for active ATM equity issuance diluting per-share gains.

AI RESEARCHER
Elon Musk AI advisor icon

Elon Musk AI

The Visionary

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 7.0%

The analysis correctly diagnoses that high-touch integration services prevent pure software operating leverage. It grounds its assessment on negative $73.8 million free cash flow, though its projected multiple derating down to 2.0x is slightly aggressive given national security procurement incumbency and accredited edge enclaves.

AI RESEARCHER
Warren Buffett AI advisor icon

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 7.0%

Grounded in owner-earnings logic, this perspective rigorously assesses capital destruction from negative operating income and $73.8 million free cash burn. It demonstrates sound understanding of federal contracting friction, though its long-term multiple target of 2.0x slightly discounts proprietary biometric software potential.

AI RESEARCHER
Superintelligence AI advisor icon

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 6.0%

This report soundly identifies the dilution trade-off behind debt retirement and models steady multiple compression toward 3.5x sales. However, it lacks deep primary filing verification and relies heavily on rhetorical framing, warranting a moderate baseline weighting.

AI RESEARCHER
Ray Dalio AI advisor icon

Ray Dalio AI

The Strategist

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 6.0%

This perspective synthesizes the macro interest-rate headwind against defense modernization demand. It properly emphasizes that high hurdle rates penalize negative cash generation, though its path flattens out prematurely in the final years without fully modeling share count expansion.

AI THINKER
Universal Investor AI advisor icon

Universal Investor AI

The Polymath

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 5.0%

Identifies the core tension between speculative AI positioning and labor-intensive IT contracting economics. However, it somewhat exaggerates immediate capital replenishment pressure given the substantial cash cushion, resulting in an overly steep intermediate derating.

AI RESEARCHER
Michael Burry AI advisor icon

Michael Burry AI

The Vulture

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 4.0%

The report highlights the 277% historical share proliferation and dilution from the 100-million-share shelf. However, its terminal multiple of 1.0x sales overlooks the defensive floor established by $409.8 million in net cash and accredited DoD enclaves, overly penalizing solvency.

AI THINKER
Warren Buffett AI advisor icon

Warren Buffett AI

The Value Seeker

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 3.0%

The owner-earnings framing correctly highlights chronic operating cash deficits and the risk of intangible goodwill write-downs. Nevertheless, the report underweights the structural downside floor provided by net cash reserves and classified facility incumbency, yielding an excessively bearish path.

AI THINKER
Superintelligence AI advisor icon

Superintelligence AI

The Anthropologist

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 1.0%

While accurately pointing out low underlying gross margins in legacy staffing, this report posits extreme insolvency risk and severe downside that ignores the company's verified $409.8 million cash hoard and negligible funded debt, making its fatalistic path implausible.

AI RESEARCHER
Machiavelli AI advisor icon

Niccolo Machiavelli AI

The Insider

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2026-09-02 release

Weight: 1.0%

The contrarian bull thesis argues executive political networks will unlock sole-source contracts and quadruple free cash flow. This view is heavily downweighted because it completely ignores organic revenue contraction, the ongoing $73.8 million cash burn, and the mechanical drag of 479 million diluted shares.

References & Context

Research Provenance

Analysis generated by iPulse AI Engine v7 using recorded market data, operating under the editorial standards and supervision of Russlan Ramdowar, Editor-in-Chief.

External references below are sources recorded by the researcher agents for this BigBear.ai forecast batch.

Primary analysis inputs

  • iPulse AI Multi-Agent Forecasts — independent analyst personas, model outputs, and consensus synthesis.
  • iPulse AI Global Events Context — macroeconomic, geopolitical, regulatory, and industry-event context.
  • Structured market history — prices, distributions, volatility, identifiers, and listing metadata.
  • Company earnings and financial statements — revenue, profitability, balance-sheet, cash-flow, and investment trends.
  • Researcher web evidence — public sources consulted to challenge and contextualize the forecast thesis.

Independent AI Advisor panel

AI Advisors
14
AI Researchers
11
AI Thinkers
3

Sources retained from AI Researcher searches

Asset-specific · Researcher web

34 available sources from this batch (84 recorded). The first 15 are shown below; expand to read the rest.

  1. FY 2026 Mandatory Funding Allocation Plan comptroller.war.gov
  2. Federal Reserve Board - Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement federalreserve.gov
  3. bbai-20260630 sec.gov
  4. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 10-Q - FY2026 sec.gov
  5. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 10-Q - FY2026 sec.gov
  6. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 424B5 - FY2026 sec.gov
  7. BigBear.ai Expands Generative AI Platform for DoW bigbear.ai
  8. BigBear.ai Finalizes $250M Acquisition of Ask Sage | BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
  9. Homeland & Border Security AI - BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
  10. Q2 2026 Results, 13% Growth & 20+ Contract Wins | BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
  11. BigBear.ai Announces Full Conversion of 6.00% Convertible Senior Secured Notes Due 2029, Significantly Strengthening Balance Sheet businesswire.com
  12. www.businesswire.com businesswire.com
  13. __symbol__ Stock Quote Price and Forecast | CNN cnn.com
  14. BBAI 2026 Q2 Earnings Release Deck d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net
  15. BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Is Pursuing Acquisitions Backed By A $100 Million Offering finance.yahoo.com
Show 19 more sources
  1. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance finance.yahoo.com
  2. BigBear.ai Share Proposal Tests Dilution Risk Against Analyst Upside Potential finance.yahoo.com
  3. BigBear.ai's Backlog Expands: Can Contract Wins Drive Revenue Growth? finance.yahoo.com
  4. BigBear.ai Completes Ask Sage Acquisition govconwire.com
  5. BIGBEAR.AI HOLDINGS Shares Outstanding (Diluted Average): 47 gurufocus.com
  6. 8-K - 03/02/2026 - BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. ir.bigbear.ai
  7. bbai-20251231 ir.bigbear.ai
  8. BigBear.ai Announces Full Conversion of 6.00% Convertible Senior Secured Notes Due 2029, Significantly Strengthening Balance Sheet :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  9. BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  10. BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  11. BigBear.ai Awarded 5-Year Production Contract Valued at $165 Million to Deliver the U.S. Army’s Global Force Information Management - Objective Environment (GFIM-OE) :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  12. BigBear.ai Awarded Contract to Modernize Critical Department of Defense Force Management Platform :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  13. BigBear.ai Awarded Prime IDIQ Contract for U.S. Department of Navy's SeaPort Next Generation (NxG) :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
  14. BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance | Morningstar morningstar.com
  15. Bringing ChatGPT to GenAI.mil | OpenAI openai.com
  16. BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Stock Falls on Q2 2026 Earnings | Quiver Quantitative quiverquant.com
  17. BigBear.ai's AI Transformation: Will Investors Reward The Pivot? (NYSE:BBAI) | Seeking Alpha seekingalpha.com
  18. BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Stock Forecast & Analyst Price Targets stockanalysis.com
  19. BBAI Stock In Focus As Defense And Airport AI Deals Advance - StocksToTrade stockstotrade.com

50 additional sources are recorded in this batch; their citation details are not available in this publication.

Context retained with this Consensus

The same public-safe market, global-event, and fundamental context supplied to the AI Advisor panel.

03

Global context snapshot

2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2025-12-31

This full-year context package covers the principal geopolitical, economic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and institutional developments that shaped global markets during 2025. It gives the forecasting model a chronological account of major world events together with their likely transmission into growth, inflation, interest rates, supply chains, commodities, currencies, public markets, and sector-level investment conditions.

Archived context covering 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31. Its recorded scope includes technology and capital cycle; trade and industrial policy; monetary policy. Selected highlights reflect the analysis cutoff, not current world conditions.

Show moreShow less
File size
90.8K bytes
Words
13.3K words
Characters
90.8K characters
Est. tokens (characters ÷ 4)
22.7K tokens

The package also includes monthly and quarterly macroeconomic and cross-asset reference tables spanning US and international growth, central-bank policy, sovereign yields, major equity indices, foreign exchange, energy, industrial and precious metals, and digital assets. Quarterly and full-year high-impact summaries are integrated; monthly quantitative series remain working values pending final audit, and that qualification is part of the preserved context.

Selected highlights from the archived 2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context snapshot
Selected highlights from this archived snapshotDateStatus
DeepSeek shock and AI economics reset2025-01-27OPEN ENDED TREND
US tariff regime escalation and trade-system rupture2025-02-01ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Federal Reserve easing cycle after a prolonged hold2025-09-17ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20

Download Archived Snapshot

Coverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-09-20

January 1-September 20, 2026: monetary tightening, energy security, trade restrictions, AI financing and divergent growth; five leading market themes.

Archived context covering 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20. Its recorded scope includes monetary policy and rates; geopolitics energy and shipping; trade and industrial policy. Selected highlights reflect the analysis cutoff, not current world conditions.

Show moreShow less
File size
84.8K bytes
Words
12.4K words
Characters
84.8K characters
Est. tokens (characters ÷ 4)
21.2K tokens

Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00%; ECB hike is in force and BOJ increase starts September 24. Markets through September 18, bitcoin through September 19.

Selected highlights from the archived 2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20 snapshot
Selected highlights from this archived snapshotDateStatus
Renewed monetary tightening amid persistent inflation2026-01-30ACTIVE POLICY REGIME
Iran/Hormuz conflict and wider energy-security disruption2026-02-28ONGOING
Tariff legal reset and strategic supply restrictions2026-02-20ACTIVE POLICY REGIME

Representative Sources of the Context File

And more sources from the retained context package.

02

Fundamental Context Passed as Input to the Models

Time range: Annual fiscal periods: 2018-12-31–2025-12-31, 8 periods; Quarterly fiscal periods: 2023-09-30–2026-06-30, 12 periods.

Currencies cited: USD (quote USD; primary reporting USD; converted/valuation USD).

Show moreShow less

Income statement

9 fields

depreciationAndAmortization · ebit · ebitda · grossProfit · +5 more fields

Balance sheet

12 fields

cash · commonStockSharesOutstanding · longTermDebt · netDebt · +8 more fields

Cash flow

5 fields

capitalExpenditures · dividendsPaid · freeCashFlow · salePurchaseOfStock · +1 more field

End of the paywalled preview

The excerpt from Deep Dive: detailed analysis to this notice is the simplified paywalled content included on this page. A signed-in, verified account with the required subscription provides the full interactive interface and the additional research, datasets and tools listed below.

Those additional materials are not included in this preview and cannot be revealed by removing its visual restrictions.

Additional with full access

  • Individual AI Advisor reports

    • Investment theses
    • Bull and bear scenarios and alpha signals
    • Drivers, headwinds, risks and opportunities
    • Quarterly forecast rationale
    • Advisor research references and configuration
  • Additional datasets and interactive tools

    • Interactive forecast comparisons
    • Available detailed financial statements
    • Market history and corporate-action adjustments
    • Eligible historical publication workspaces

Explore complete public research examples

These public assets show the complete AI Consensus research. Their findings concern those assets, not this report.