AI Consensus Investment Thesis
BBAI: BigBear.ai Stock Price, Analysis & Forecast: 1 Year and 5 Year Targets
BigBear.ai: 1-Year and 5-Year Forecast Outlook and Rating
BigBear.ai (BBAI) has an immediate Do Not Add consensus AI recommendation, based on 14 AI analysts.
The 1-year target is $2.40 for , with +10.60% expected return (+10.60% including net dividends) and a NEUTRAL rating.
The 5-year target is $1.95 for , with -10.14% expected return (-10.14% including net dividends) and a PARTIAL SELL rating.
Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026.
Dividend calculation details
Calculated net annual dividend yield: 0%. As of 2026-10-20.
Gross TTM: 0% · Two-year annualized gross: 0%.
Tax withholding assumption: 30% (US). One-off special payments are excluded.
Return estimates compound the net annual yield at a constant rate over the stated return horizon (the remaining time to the fixed target date for current returns): (1 + price return) × (1 + net annual yield)years − 1.
Targets retain their original publication dates. Returns use the dated market close and the time remaining to each fixed target date. Current ratings also require fresh quotes and analysis, with more than 90 days remaining. Past targets have no forward return. Eligibility checked .
BigBear.ai Flagship Insight
Defense Software Multiple Deflates as Relentless Dilution Erases Topline Gains
There is sharp divergence between headline AI turnaround narratives and underlying equity mechanics. While consensus acknowledges balance sheet solvency via $409.8 million in cash, persistent negative free cash flow and continuous share dilution structurally compress elevated sales multiples toward defense services reality.
How were the Investment Thesis and Forecasts created?
14 AI advisors, guided by 9 analytical frameworks, contribute to the deep analysis by iPulse AI Engine.
Superintelligence (Anthropologist)
Warren Buffett (Value Purist)
Universal Investor (Polymath)
Michael Burry (Vulture)
Elon Musk (Visionary)
Sherlock Holmes (Whistleblower)
Ray Dalio (Strategist)
J.P. Morgan (Titan)
Machiavelli (Insider)
Ran across these frontier AI models
Google Gemini 3.8 Flash
Anthropic Claude Opus 5
OpenAI GPT-6 Astra
Latest published deep-analysis batch. Audit published forecasts in full transparency
BigBear.ai: forecast questions
What is BigBear.ai (BBAI)'s 1-year price forecast?
BigBear.ai's 1-year target is $2.40 for Sept 2027. The current AI rating is NEUTRAL. The expected return from the recorded close is +10.60%, or +10.60% modeled return including net dividends. Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. The target date is fixed; this is not a new rolling forecast.
What is BigBear.ai (BBAI)'s 5-year price forecast?
BigBear.ai's 5-year target is $1.95 for Sept 2031. The current AI rating is PARTIAL SELL. The expected return from the recorded close is -10.14%, or -10.14% modeled return including net dividends. Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. The target date is fixed; this is not a new rolling forecast.
What is the return basis?
Latest available market price: USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026. These are model projections, not guaranteed future prices.
How can I compare the AI opinions and audit past BigBear.ai forecasts?
14 AI analysts contribute to this publication. AI Opinions shows individual advisor forecasts and reasoning. Forecast History preserves earlier published batches; their figures describe their original publication, not today's outlook.
How does an AI-generated forecast for BigBear.ai differ from Wall Street analyst consensus?
Wall Street consensus aggregates estimates from human analysts. For listed companies, these typically include brokerage price targets, earnings forecasts and ratings. iPulse AI's forecast for BigBear.ai is a separate AI consensus generated through its own research workflow. Different inputs, forecast dates, assumptions and weighting can therefore produce different targets.
We believe the era of investment research conducted only by human analysts is drawing to a close. Frontier models increasingly match or exceed expert work on selected professional benchmarks, including evaluations covering financial analysis. Research on multi-model synthesis also shows that combining model responses can improve on a single model's output in the tasks studied.
iPulse AI generates transparent investment research and market forecasts using a swarm of AI configurations, analytical frameworks and frontier models. The workflow applies multiple verification, challenge and synthesis layers, with selective editorial review under Russlan Ramdowar, Editor-in-Chief. Published assumptions, disagreements and past forecasts remain available so readers can inspect the reasoning and audit outcomes.
For a research cycle covering 426 assets with 14 perspectives per asset, our internal workload model estimates approximately 114,000 hours of traditional analyst work. It assumes 16 hours per individual research report, 28 hours per consensus for synthesis and validation, plus shared data preparation. Parallel AI execution allows a deep-analysis cycle across hundreds of assets to complete in up to one day. The human-hours figure is an illustrative workload estimate, rather than measured time savings. Our research methodology explains the automated workflow.
BigBear.ai: Investment Thesis Summary
Dotted terms link to the glossary; hover or focus for a preview. Browse technical terms
If you invest $10,000 in BigBear.ai at the latest market close (20 Oct 2026): $8,986 by Sept 2031 versus $13,751 for S&P 500 benchmark.
Returns use the same dated market close, fixed targets and remaining dividend period as the forecast table.
The fundamental tension centers on a decoupling between enterprise progress and per-share equity value. Management successfully mitigated insolvency risks by converting $124.6 million of convertible debt and accumulating $409.8 million in cash. However, this balance-sheet fortress was funded by expanding the share count to 479.5 million, with an open 100-million-share shelf creating persistent supply overhang. Operationally, Q2 2026 revenue rebound to $36.7 million and gross margin expansion to 32.8% reflect acquired Ask Sage software, while organic revenue fell 6%. With trailing free cash flow at negative $73.8 million, the company operates as a human-capital-intensive defense integrator rather than a scalable platform. Valuation at over 10x trailing sales must contract toward defense-IT norms of 2.5x to 3.5x.
Key insights
- Dilution decouples growth: enterprise revenue can compound at mid-teens rates while per-share revenue stagnates under ongoing secondary issuance and incentive compensation.
- Gross margin expansion from acquired software wrappers is systematically absorbed by elevated engineering overhead, integration costs, and compliance expenses, postponing GAAP profitability.
- Classified facility accreditations and homeland security incumbency establish a resilient revenue floor, but defense prime gatekeepers capture lead contractor rents.
BigBear.ai: 5 Year Consensus Forecast
20 quarterly price targets, returns and rationale, with advisor range and benchmark
Forward returns are updated using the latest market close price of USD 2.17, as of 20 Oct 2026.
Dividend calculation details
Calculated net annual dividend yield: 0%. As of 2026-10-20.
Gross TTM: 0% · Two-year annualized gross: 0%.
Tax withholding assumption: 30% (US). One-off special payments are excluded.
Return estimates compound the net annual yield at a constant rate over the stated return horizon (the remaining time to the fixed target date for current returns): (1 + price return) × (1 + net annual yield)years − 1.
The consensus target follows an expert-weighted price path synthesized from 14 AI advisor opinions. See Opinion weights and rationale for the exact allocation and reasoning.
Forecast methodology and reference values
Published targets are anchored on 18 Sept 2026 at USD 2.8. Original quarter-to-quarter target changes are retained. Forward returns use the remaining time to each fixed target date.
The pessimistic and optimistic advisor base cases are the lowest and highest published advisor base-case targets for each quarter. The advisor at either extreme can change between quarters. Benchmark values are in USD.
Scroll the table horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Evidence-Weighted Consensus Price Path | Individual Advisor Range & Reference Forecasts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus target (USD) | Forecast quarter-to-quarter price change | Forward price return | Forward return incl. net dividends | Forecast rationale | Pessimistic Advisor Base Case (USD) | Optimistic Advisor Base Case (USD) | S&P 500 benchmark (USD) | |
| $2.62 | -6.26% | +20.74% | +20.74% | Monetary tightening and discount rate scrutiny deflate speculative multiples. Investors digest persistent cash burn and the 100-million-share shelf overhang, discounting headline contract announcements despite baseline defense procurement stability. | $2.46 | $2.91 | $750 | |
| $2.49 | -4.97% | +14.75% | +14.75% | Full-year 2026 reporting confirms top-line stabilization driven by Ask Sage consolidation, but operating losses remain near $90 million. Substantial share dilution tempers enthusiasm, triggering multiple contraction toward defense contractor peers. | $2.09 | $3.09 | $736 | |
| $2.50 | +0.38% | +15.21% | +15.21% | Incremental airport biometric deployments and task-order wins under federal vehicles provide modest commercial validation. A localized relief rally lifts sentiment, though gains are capped by high overhead and ongoing share issuance. | $2.00 | $3.33 | $743 | |
| $2.40 | -3.96% | +10.60% | +10.60% | Federal fiscal year-end budget debates cause contract authorization slippage. Heavy engineering overhead and selling expenses absorb gross margin gains, prompting fundamental institutional investors to de-risk holdings across unprofitable small-cap defense technology. | $1.80 | $3.50 | $755 | |
| $2.31 | -3.92% | +6.45% | +6.45% | Management taps the active at-the-market equity shelf to finance working capital needs. Year-end tax-loss harvesting and expanding share float overwhelm retail buying interest, driving quoted equity prices lower. | $1.60 | $3.61 | $776 | |
| $2.26 | -2.15% | +4.15% | +4.15% | Audited 2027 results reveal sluggish organic software growth beneath acquired lines, while free cash flow remains negative. Valuation multiples contract as analysts reject pure SaaS multiples in favor of services-heavy benchmarks. | $1.41 | $3.86 | $787 | |
| $2.21 | -2.26% | +1.84% | +1.84% | Classified software installations expand across joint commands, lifting high-margin licensing. Modest sequential gross profit expansion establishes a transient valuation floor, temporarily halting downward momentum across public trading venues. | $1.52 | $4.09 | $803 | |
| $2.18 | -1.25% | +0.46% | +0.46% | Election-cycle budgetary gridlock delays defense appropriations, slowing backlog conversion across national security accounts. Competitive pressure from defense primes squeezes subcontractor margins, reigniting downward drift across the equity base. | $1.32 | $4.25 | $812 | |
| $2.08 | -4.47% | -4.15% | -4.15% | Post-election appropriations unlock delayed task orders, generating a seasonal sentiment lift. However, cumulative share count expansion continues to dilute per-share asset backing, muting overall price recovery into year-end. | $1.22 | $4.34 | $839 | |
| $2.09 | +0.08% | -3.69% | -3.69% | Full-year 2028 disclosures demonstrate top-line growth toward $180 million, but persistent SG&A bloat prevents GAAP operating profitability. Market participants systematically align valuation multiples with low-margin government IT consulting peers. | $1.11 | $4.55 | $851 | |
| $2.11 | +0.94% | -2.76% | -2.76% | Commercial vision deployments across international transport gateways demonstrate cross-selling execution outside federal agencies. Incremental software licensing revenue supports a brief valuation rebound, encouraging specialized technology value allocators. | $1.16 | $4.74 | $872 | |
| $2.08 | -1.15% | -4.15% | -4.15% | Defense budget reprioritization slows non-priority software allocations. Revenue lumpiness resurfaces as contract renewals face extended administrative scrutiny, triggering algorithmic selling as forward growth assumptions are trimmed. | $1.08 | $4.83 | $886 | |
| $2.02 | -2.92% | -6.91% | -6.91% | Restructuring initiatives modestly contain administrative overhead, but ongoing stock-based compensation expands the share float. The market prices the firm strictly as a specialized hybrid defense integrator, capping upside momentum. | $0.99 | $4.98 | $910 | |
| $2.02 | -0.01% | -6.91% | -6.91% | Fiscal 2029 reporting indicates operating cash flow approaching neutral thresholds as Ask Sage reaches critical deployment scale. Relieved solvency fears provide fundamental price support near tangible asset value. | $0.92 | $5.23 | $916 | |
| $2.01 | -0.34% | -7.37% | -7.37% | Remaining ATM shelf capacity is exercised to fund autonomous edge intelligence upgrades. The influx of newly registered common shares dilutes per-share economics, offsetting positive operational news releases. | $0.98 | $5.33 | $937 | |
| $2.00 | -0.71% | -7.83% | -7.83% | Sustained biometric border maintenance billings deliver predictable baseline cash generation. Stable federal procurement cushions operations, establishing an orderly trading range supported by remaining balance sheet cash reserves. | $0.93 | $5.28 | $947 | |
| $1.96 | -1.84% | -9.68% | -9.68% | Macroeconomic stabilization and steady defense IT spending cap downside volatility, though lack of proprietary foundational model scale prevents multiple expansion. Trading volume subsides into seasonal portfolio rebalancing. | $0.89 | $5.43 | $970 | |
| $1.96 | -0.16% | -9.68% | -9.68% | Full-year 2030 statements confirm revenue crossing $220 million with slender operating margins. Growth funds exit toward higher-margin enterprise software platforms, leaving the equity anchored to low single-digit multiples. | $0.87 | $5.65 | $980 | |
| $1.96 | +0.26% | -9.68% | -9.68% | Predictable software maintenance renewals and cost-containment measures support modest operational stability. The enterprise generates sufficient cash to self-fund maintenance, removing distressed discounts while per-share progress remains subdued. | $0.86 | $5.77 | $1,000 | |
| $1.95 | -0.56% | -10.14% | -10.14% | The five-year forecast horizon concludes with equity valuation fully synchronized to normalized defense contractor economics. Top-line expansion is counterbalanced by historical dilution, leaving shares grounded at intrinsic replacement value. | $0.82 | $5.88 | $1,012 | |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
BigBear.ai Stock Analysis & Scenarios Deep Dive
BigBear.ai: Alpha Gap & Repricing Catalysts
Market Narrative
What does the market currently expect? The retail market and speculative momentum traders view the company as an undervalued pure-play defense artificial intelligence disruptor positioned to emulate Palantir. This public narrative anchors heavily on headline sovereign defense spending, recent airport biometric wins, and the optical elimination of convertible debt. The crowd mistakenly treats acquired consulting billings as scalable software subscriptions, while overlooking chronic negative free cash flow and severe per-share share count expansion.
Alpha Gap
What is the biggest difference between market expectations and our AI forecasts? The crowd materially overestimates intrinsic equity value, creating marked overpricing. The market's central blind spot is confusing balance-sheet restructuring with commercial software dominion. Extinguishing debt eliminated default risk but flooded the float with 479.5 million shares, causing revenue per share to collapse by over 70%. Furthermore, Q2 2026 top-line growth was entirely inorganic, concealing a 6% organic contraction. Trading at over 10x sales for a negative-cash-flow government integrator ensures severe multiple compression toward realistic contractor benchmarks.
Repricing Catalyst
What could make the market recognize and close that gap? Successive audited financial releases across 2027 will shatter software turnaround assumptions when organic revenue growth stalls and quarterly cash burn persists above $15 million. Repricing will accelerate when management actively draws down its 100-million-share shelf facility to fund operating deficits. The tangible dilution and inability to show operating leverage will force institutional models to rebase valuations from speculative software multiples toward standard defense services multiples.
BigBear.ai: Sentiment and Timing
What do sentiment, volatility, and the market-recognition cycle suggest about the thesis timing?
- Greed and Fear Sentiment
- Fear
- Volatility Regime
- High Erratic
- Convergence Cycle Position
- Reversal
Sentiment assessments agree that speculative AI euphoria is reversing as discount rates expose chronic cash burn. The primary tension lies between contrarians expecting imminent short-squeeze stabilization and fundamental bears projecting relentless multiple deflation driven by continuous secondary equity dilution.
Macro Regime Fit
Does the current market environment support the thesis? The prevailing macro backdrop of Federal Reserve policy rates near 4.00% and benchmark Treasury yields near 5.00% creates a severe valuation headwind. High discount rates penalize unprofitable duration assets trading at double-digit price-to-sales ratios. Although expanding national security budgets provide a resilient procurement floor, elevated capital costs and persistent cleared-labor inflation aggressively compress speculative small-cap valuation multiples.
Advisor Disagreement
What do our AI Advisors disagree about most? The decisive disagreement centers on whether the Ask Sage and Pangiam acquisitions represent a structural pivot toward high-margin software or an optical illusion masking sub-scale consulting economics. Bullish perspectives argue that accredited classified enclaves create insurmountable regulatory moats that will drive gross margins past 40% and unlock rapid cash break-even. In contrast, bearish and disciplined consensus analyses emphasize that organic revenue contracted 6% in Q2 2026, while ongoing cash burn of $73.8 million necessitates continuous share printing under the 100-million shelf. This debate will resolve when fiscal 2027 audited statements demonstrate whether organic software revenue can scale without accelerating administrative overhead.
BigBear.ai: Critical Influencing Factors
Near-certain positive forcesTop Drivers & Tailwinds
Near-certain forces that support the investment thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal defense AI procurement expansion | Sector And Industry | +22% | +34% | Geopolitical fragmentation and Pentagon modernization initiatives drive sustained appropriations toward tactical decision support and autonomous command architectures. Active prime vehicles including Army GFIM-OE and Navy SeaPort-NxG secure baseline defense revenue. This non-discretionary federal spending stream protects core operations from commercial software churn, providing visible contract backlog expansion across the five-year forecast horizon. |
| Ask Sage sovereign AI software mix | Innovation And Product | +18% | +32% | Integrating Ask Sage introduces FedRAMP-accredited generative software capable of operating within classified, air-gapped defense enclaves. Delivering software licenses rather than pass-through integration hours expands gross margins from historic mid-20% ranges toward 33-35%. This transition improves contract unit economics and establishes high switching costs, shielding recurring government software billings from civilian competition. |
| Homeland border biometric screening rollout | Competitive Positioning | +15% | +22% | Mandates across Customs and Border Protection accelerate the deployment of Pangiam computer-vision screening at major transit hubs. Operational installations across international gateways provide recurring subscription and maintenance revenues. This commercial identity verification footprint diversifies billings away from purely military appropriations, strengthening gross margins and improving visibility through multi-year institutional screening renewals. |
| Balance sheet recapitalization liquidity runway | Capital Allocation | +12% | +14% | Converting senior notes eliminated over $124 million in debt, leaving funded obligations under $18 million alongside $409.8 million in cash. This balance-sheet transformation removes near-term insolvency risks, eliminating debt-distress discounting. The liquidity buffer grants management roughly four years of operational runway to execute product integration without seeking punitive high-yield debt financing. |
Near-certain negative forcesTop Frictions & Headwinds
Near-certain forces that could slow, cap, or damage the thesis. These forces are treated as part of the base case (more than 60% probability of occurrence). Impact columns are specific to this asset class.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent share dilution from shelf | Capital Allocation | -35% | -10% | Aggressive equity issuance expanded common shares from under 150 million to 479.5 million, while an active 100-million-share shelf creates permanent supply overhang. Using equity to fund operating deficits systematically reduces revenue per share and book value. This persistent supply dilutes residual shareholder claims, placing an impenetrable ceiling on equity appreciation despite nominal sales gains. |
| Extreme valuation multiple deflationary compression | Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial | -32% | -5.0% | Trading at over 10x sales while generating negative $73.8 million in free cash flow leaves the stock precariously overvalued against defense IT peers trading below 2x sales. Elevated interest rates near 4.00% penalize unhedged, negative-cash-flow duration. As speculative hype normalizes, relentless multiple compression toward government contractor benchmarks exerts severe gravitational drag on share prices. |
| Structural operating cash burn persistence | Operational Efficiency | -26% | -35% | Despite software marketing, operations remain heavily dependent on expensive cleared engineering labor, with cost of revenues absorbing roughly 67% of gross billings. Operating expenses exceed gross profit by threefold, while TTM operating losses stand at $95.9 million. Without proprietary platform scalability, corporate overhead continually consumes gross profits, delaying GAAP operating self-sufficiency beyond the forecast horizon. |
| Subcontractor subordination to defense primes | Competitive Positioning | -18% | -24% | Entrenched defense conglomerates and well-capitalized software competitors like Palantir dominate flagship command-and-control programs. Lacking sovereign scale and massive lobbying apparatuses, the company is frequently relegated to lower-margin subcontractor roles. This subordinate position restricts pricing power on contract recompetes, subjects deliveries to prime-contractor margin squeezes, and constricts long-term pipeline conversion. |
BigBear.ai: What Could Break or Accelerate the Thesis
Event Risk Score: Very High 94/100Asset-level relative pressure from clustered consensus frictions and tail risks. This is not the probability or risk score of an individual force.Plausible downside scenariosTail Risks
Tail yet plausible downside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.
Scroll to view all columns
| Tail scenario | Chance of Occurring | Stock Price Impact | Why plausible / what changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catastrophic goodwill impairment and restructuring | 32% | -55% | Deteriorating financial returns from Pangiam and Ask Sage acquisitions force auditors to mandate massive impairment write-downs against more than $500 million in capitalized intangibles by 2028. Triggered by persistent operating losses and slowing seat expansion, this forensic purge would eviscerate reported common equity, shatter fundamental credibility, and force distressed dilutive recapitalizations at penny-stock valuations. |
| Flagship federal contract cancellation or defunding | 28% | -50% | The Department of the Army or a major intelligence customer cancels or deobligates core task orders under the GFIM-OE framework following federal austerity reviews. Triggered by government efficiency initiatives by late 2027, losing this sole-source anchor vehicle would erase over 25% of forward revenue visibility, causing unabsorbed engineering overhead to accelerate cash burn toward distress levels. |
Plausible upside scenariosTail Opportunities
Tail yet plausible upside scenarios selected for their highest potential impact.
Scroll to view all columns
| Tail scenario | Chance of Occurring | Stock Price Impact | Why plausible / what changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark TSA enterprise biometric prime award | 24% | +85% | The Transportation Security Administration awards the company an exclusive multi-year prime contract exceeding $750 million to modernize domestic aviation checkpoint screening. Triggered by federal statutory travel automation mandates by 2028, this award leverages Pangiam's accredited algorithms. The win would triple annual revenues, convert structural cash burn into positive operating leverage, and prompt an institutional re-rating toward defense infrastructure multiples. |
| Strategic buyout by defense conglomerate | 22% | +60% | A tier-one aerospace and defense prime launches a full acquisition tender at a substantial control premium to capture accredited CMMC Level 2 enclaves and Ask Sage generative workflows. Triggered by an urgent mandate to internalize classified edge AI by late 2028, this transaction eliminates standalone cash-burn risks and crystallizes instant value above cash reserves. |
Company Financial AnalysisBigBear.ai: Earnings and Financials Analysis by AI
Financial figures available as of Sep 20, 2026. Only filings and source records available by this analysis date are included. View latest BigBear.ai financials here.
Earnings and financials
The latest results show a business working hard to stabilize after severe contract cutbacks. After revenue dropped over 19% in 2025 to $128 million due to expiring Army contracts, second-quarter 2026 revenue rose 13% to $36.7 million. However, this recovery was largely purchased rather than built, coming almost entirely from newly acquired Ask Sage software. Excluding acquisitions, underlying legacy sales actually contracted. Beneath the stabilized sales headlines, true earnings remain deeply negative. The company lost $28.6 million from operations in the second quarter, while burning nearly $74 million in free cash flow over the trailing twelve months. High spending on administrative overhead and integration continues to swallow gross profits, leaving positive cash generation distant.
Revenue, earnings, and cash flow
The table compares up to five fiscal years of revenue, net income, and free cash flow available to this analysis.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Net income | Free cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | USD 127.7M | USD -293.9M | USD -46.3M |
| 2024 | USD 158.2M | USD -295.5M | USD -49.2M |
| 2023 | USD 155.2M | USD -70.7M | USD -22.1M |
| 2022 | USD 155M | USD -111.4M | USD -49.7M |
| 2021 | USD 145.6M | USD -123.6M | USD -20.4M |
Valuation context: historical P/E
The table compares up to five fiscal years of point-in-time valuation evidence available to this analysis.
| Fiscal year | P/E | Earnings basis | Currency basis | Ticker / reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -- | TTM | Loss-making | USD / USD |
| 2024 | -- | TTM | Loss-making | USD / USD |
| 2023 | -- | TTM | Loss-making | USD / USD |
| 2022 | -- | Annual | Loss-making | USD / USD |
| 2021 | -- | Annual | Loss-making | USD / USD |
P/E uses historical market capitalization and earnings known at each period. Cross-currency observations are normalized to USD using point-in-time FX rates.
Profitability and margins
Profit margins tell two completely different stories depending on which line you examine. Gross margin improved nicely to 32.8% in the second quarter of 2026, rising from 25% a year earlier. This improvement reflects the arrival of higher-margin Ask Sage software licenses, which generate better profit per dollar than older, labor-heavy government staffing contracts. Unfortunately, operating margins remain deep in the red at negative 77% for the quarter. Running a defense company requires substantial administrative, security clearance, and sales expenses that completely wipe out gross profit. Until high-margin software sales grow large enough to absorb fixed corporate overhead, overall profit margins will remain severely depressed.
The table compares up to five fiscal years of operating income and reported profitability margins.
| Fiscal year | Operating income | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | USD -83.4M | -65.3% | -230.2% |
| 2024 | USD -133.4M | -84.3% | -186.8% |
| 2023 | USD -39M | -25.2% | -45.5% |
| 2022 | USD -110.5M | -71.3% | -71.8% |
| 2021 | USD -78.5M | -53.9% | -84.9% |
Balance sheet and leverage
The balance sheet looks remarkably healthy on the surface following a major debt restructuring in early 2026. Management eliminated over $124 million of convertible debt by turning it into common stock, leaving funded debt at under $18 million. By selling additional shares, the company accumulated roughly $410 million in cash and investments, providing about four years of operating safety. However, this newfound safety came at a high price for existing shareholders. Converting debt and issuing stock quadrupled the share count to nearly 480 million shares, permanently diluting ownership. Furthermore, more than half of the company's reported assets consist of vulnerable goodwill from acquisitions, which could face future accounting write-downs if software growth slows.
The table compares up to five fiscal years of debt, liquidity, net cash or debt, and current-ratio evidence.
| Fiscal year | Total debt | Cash + short-term investments | Reported net cash / (debt) | Debt less (cash + short-term investments), calculated | Current ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | USD 24.3M | USD 87.1M | USD 62.8M net cash | USD -62.8M | 1.78x |
| 2024 | USD 146.4M | USD 50.1M | USD 96.3M net debt | USD 96.3M | 0.46x |
| 2023 | USD 200.6M | USD 32.6M | USD 168M net debt | USD 168M | 0.93x |
| 2022 | USD 200.3M | USD 12.6M | USD 187.6M net debt | USD 187.6M | 1.52x |
| 2021 | USD 194.6M | USD 68.9M | USD 125.7M net debt | USD 125.7M | 2.94x |
Reported net debt retains the source definition, which can deduct cash alone. Cash plus short-term investments is broader liquidity; the separately calculated column subtracts that full amount from total debt for the same fiscal period and currency. Reported net debt below zero is displayed as net cash. Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities.
Capex and investment intensity
Management spends very little money on physical buildings or equipment, keeping traditional capital expenditures near 3% of revenue. Instead, the company channels its investment dollars into buying outside businesses and funding software research. The pivotal move was spending over $250 million to acquire Ask Sage, attempting to buy classified software capabilities that would otherwise take years to develop. While buying pre-certified software helps avoid government certification delays, it introduces heavy integration burdens and non-cash amortization expenses. Spending on internal research and development has climbed above $7 million per quarter. These investments commit substantial liquid cash to software development without guaranteeing that future contract revenues will cover the costs.
The table compares up to five fiscal years of capital expenditure and research-and-development investment.
| Fiscal year | Capital expenditure | R&D spend |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | USD 4.4M | USD 16.8M |
| 2024 | USD 11.1M | USD 10.9M |
| 2023 | USD 3.8M | USD 5M |
| 2022 | USD 769K | USD 8.4M |
| 2021 | USD 645K | USD 6M |
Behind the synthesisBigBear.ai: How Each Individual AI Forecaster Opinion Shapes the Global Consensus
This publication’s recorded synthesis allocated voting influence across 14 advisor opinions. The weights and rationales below are retained from that synthesis.
The independently supported consensus pattern establishes that the enterprise successfully neutralized near-term bankruptcy risk by converting $124.6 million of convertible notes and accumulating $409.8 million in cash. However, this balance-sheet rehabilitation was purchased via aggressive equity dilution that expanded common shares to 479.5 million, with an active shelf facility threatening further supply. Operationally, Q2 2026 revenue rebound to $36.7 million and gross margin expansion to 32.8% were inorganic, driven by the Ask Sage consolidation, while legacy sales contracted 6% and trailing free cash flow burned negative $73.8 million. The strongest contrarian case posits that political leadership and sovereign AI accreditations will ignite pure software operating leverage; this claim collapses under scrutiny because high-touch defense integration and swelling administrative overhead consume gross profits. Relative weights heavily favor rigorous filings-based analyses documenting unit-of-account per-share dilution, while heavily downweighting unevidenced hypergrowth or premature insolvency claims.
All 14 opinions
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Weight: 16.0%
Exceptional evidentiary rigor supported by SEC filings and DoD comptroller releases. It isolates that legacy revenue contracted 6% once excluding Ask Sage, demonstrates that interest rate hikes compound duration penalties on 10.2x sales, and articulates why cash protects solvency without validating an inflated enterprise multiple.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Weight: 16.0%
Outstanding factual accuracy using Form 10-Q and 424B5 filings. It cleanly demonstrates the unit-of-account blind spot: enterprise revenue can compound at 15% while per-share value erodes under 479.5 million shares and open shelves, anchoring realistic valuation around net tangible book and rerated software multiples.
Sherlock Holmes AI
The Whistleblower
Weight: 10.0%
This report provides balanced forensic accounting, acknowledging the $410 million liquidity buffer while identifying the valuation ceiling imposed by share dilution. It anchors realistic defense-IT multiple deflation from 10.2x toward 3.5x sales, recognizing that inorganic Ask Sage additions cannot fully offset high general and administrative cost drag.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Weight: 9.0%
This analysis provides a clear bridge between federal programmatic tailwinds and the per-share dilution arithmetic. It accurately notes the 70% collapse in revenue per share despite top-line expansion, correctly identifying that ongoing ATM issuance caps equity appreciation across the five-year horizon.
J.P. Morgan AI
The Titan
Weight: 9.0%
Presents a balanced, institutional appraisal of defense vassal dynamics, where tier-one primes capture superior economics while the company absorbs subcontractor risks. It accurately models multiple compression toward 4.5x sales and accounts for active ATM equity issuance diluting per-share gains.
Elon Musk AI
The Visionary
Weight: 7.0%
The analysis correctly diagnoses that high-touch integration services prevent pure software operating leverage. It grounds its assessment on negative $73.8 million free cash flow, though its projected multiple derating down to 2.0x is slightly aggressive given national security procurement incumbency and accredited edge enclaves.
Warren Buffett AI
The Value Seeker
Weight: 7.0%
Grounded in owner-earnings logic, this perspective rigorously assesses capital destruction from negative operating income and $73.8 million free cash burn. It demonstrates sound understanding of federal contracting friction, though its long-term multiple target of 2.0x slightly discounts proprietary biometric software potential.
Superintelligence AI
The Anthropologist
Weight: 6.0%
This report soundly identifies the dilution trade-off behind debt retirement and models steady multiple compression toward 3.5x sales. However, it lacks deep primary filing verification and relies heavily on rhetorical framing, warranting a moderate baseline weighting.
Ray Dalio AI
The Strategist
Weight: 6.0%
This perspective synthesizes the macro interest-rate headwind against defense modernization demand. It properly emphasizes that high hurdle rates penalize negative cash generation, though its path flattens out prematurely in the final years without fully modeling share count expansion.
Universal Investor AI
The Polymath
Weight: 5.0%
Identifies the core tension between speculative AI positioning and labor-intensive IT contracting economics. However, it somewhat exaggerates immediate capital replenishment pressure given the substantial cash cushion, resulting in an overly steep intermediate derating.
Michael Burry AI
The Vulture
Weight: 4.0%
The report highlights the 277% historical share proliferation and dilution from the 100-million-share shelf. However, its terminal multiple of 1.0x sales overlooks the defensive floor established by $409.8 million in net cash and accredited DoD enclaves, overly penalizing solvency.
Warren Buffett AI
The Value Seeker
Weight: 3.0%
The owner-earnings framing correctly highlights chronic operating cash deficits and the risk of intangible goodwill write-downs. Nevertheless, the report underweights the structural downside floor provided by net cash reserves and classified facility incumbency, yielding an excessively bearish path.
Superintelligence AI
The Anthropologist
Weight: 1.0%
While accurately pointing out low underlying gross margins in legacy staffing, this report posits extreme insolvency risk and severe downside that ignores the company's verified $409.8 million cash hoard and negligible funded debt, making its fatalistic path implausible.
Niccolo Machiavelli AI
The Insider
Weight: 1.0%
The contrarian bull thesis argues executive political networks will unlock sole-source contracts and quadruple free cash flow. This view is heavily downweighted because it completely ignores organic revenue contraction, the ongoing $73.8 million cash burn, and the mechanical drag of 479 million diluted shares.
References & Context
Research Provenance
Analysis generated by iPulse AI Engine v7 using recorded market data, operating under the editorial standards and supervision of Russlan Ramdowar, Editor-in-Chief.
External references below are sources recorded by the researcher agents for this BigBear.ai forecast batch.
Primary analysis inputs
- iPulse AI Multi-Agent Forecasts — independent analyst personas, model outputs, and consensus synthesis.
- iPulse AI Global Events Context — macroeconomic, geopolitical, regulatory, and industry-event context.
- Structured market history — prices, distributions, volatility, identifiers, and listing metadata.
- Company earnings and financial statements — revenue, profitability, balance-sheet, cash-flow, and investment trends.
- Researcher web evidence — public sources consulted to challenge and contextualize the forecast thesis.
Independent AI Advisor panel
- AI Advisors
- 14
- AI Researchers
- 11
- AI Thinkers
- 3
Sources retained from AI Researcher searches
Asset-specific · Researcher web34 available sources from this batch (84 recorded). The first 15 are shown below; expand to read the rest.
- FY 2026 Mandatory Funding Allocation Plan comptroller.war.gov
- Federal Reserve Board - Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement federalreserve.gov
- bbai-20260630 sec.gov
- BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 10-Q - FY2026 sec.gov
- BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 10-Q - FY2026 sec.gov
- BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. - Form 424B5 - FY2026 sec.gov
- BigBear.ai Expands Generative AI Platform for DoW bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Finalizes $250M Acquisition of Ask Sage | BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
- Homeland & Border Security AI - BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
- Q2 2026 Results, 13% Growth & 20+ Contract Wins | BigBear.ai bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Announces Full Conversion of 6.00% Convertible Senior Secured Notes Due 2029, Significantly Strengthening Balance Sheet businesswire.com
- www.businesswire.com businesswire.com
- __symbol__ Stock Quote Price and Forecast | CNN cnn.com
- BBAI 2026 Q2 Earnings Release Deck d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net
- BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Is Pursuing Acquisitions Backed By A $100 Million Offering finance.yahoo.com
Show 19 more sources
- BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance finance.yahoo.com
- BigBear.ai Share Proposal Tests Dilution Risk Against Analyst Upside Potential finance.yahoo.com
- BigBear.ai's Backlog Expands: Can Contract Wins Drive Revenue Growth? finance.yahoo.com
- BigBear.ai Completes Ask Sage Acquisition govconwire.com
- BIGBEAR.AI HOLDINGS Shares Outstanding (Diluted Average): 47 gurufocus.com
- 8-K - 03/02/2026 - BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. ir.bigbear.ai
- bbai-20251231 ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Announces Full Conversion of 6.00% Convertible Senior Secured Notes Due 2029, Significantly Strengthening Balance Sheet :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Awarded 5-Year Production Contract Valued at $165 Million to Deliver the U.S. Army’s Global Force Information Management - Objective Environment (GFIM-OE) :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Awarded Contract to Modernize Critical Department of Defense Force Management Platform :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Awarded Prime IDIQ Contract for U.S. Department of Navy's SeaPort Next Generation (NxG) :: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) ir.bigbear.ai
- BigBear.ai Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results; Delivers 13% Growth, 20+ New Contract Wins, and Expanded Margins; Affirms Full Year Revenue Guidance | Morningstar morningstar.com
- Bringing ChatGPT to GenAI.mil | OpenAI openai.com
- BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Stock Falls on Q2 2026 Earnings | Quiver Quantitative quiverquant.com
- BigBear.ai's AI Transformation: Will Investors Reward The Pivot? (NYSE:BBAI) | Seeking Alpha seekingalpha.com
- BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Stock Forecast & Analyst Price Targets stockanalysis.com
- BBAI Stock In Focus As Defense And Airport AI Deals Advance - StocksToTrade stockstotrade.com
50 additional sources are recorded in this batch; their citation details are not available in this publication.
Context retained with this Consensus
The same public-safe market, global-event, and fundamental context supplied to the AI Advisor panel.
Global context snapshot
2025 Full-Year Global Market and World-Events Context
Download Archived SnapshotCoverage 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · Knowledge cutoff 2025-12-31
This full-year context package covers the principal geopolitical, economic, monetary-policy, technology, trade, energy, and institutional developments that shaped global markets during 2025. It gives the forecasting model a chronological account of major world events together with their likely transmission into growth, inflation, interest rates, supply chains, commodities, currencies, public markets, and sector-level investment conditions.
Archived context covering 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31. Its recorded scope includes technology and capital cycle; trade and industrial policy; monetary policy. Selected highlights reflect the analysis cutoff, not current world conditions.
Show moreShow less
- File size
- 90.8K bytes
- Words
- 13.3K words
- Characters
- 90.8K characters
- Est. tokens (characters ÷ 4)
- 22.7K tokens
The package also includes monthly and quarterly macroeconomic and cross-asset reference tables spanning US and international growth, central-bank policy, sovereign yields, major equity indices, foreign exchange, energy, industrial and precious metals, and digital assets. Quarterly and full-year high-impact summaries are integrated; monthly quantitative series remain working values pending final audit, and that qualification is part of the preserved context.
| Selected highlights from this archived snapshot | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek shock and AI economics reset | 2025-01-27 | OPEN ENDED TREND |
| US tariff regime escalation and trade-system rupture | 2025-02-01 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
| Federal Reserve easing cycle after a prolonged hold | 2025-09-17 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
Representative Sources of the Context File
And more sources from the retained context package.
2026 Year-to-Date Global Market and World-Events Context Through September 20
Download Archived SnapshotCoverage 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20 · Knowledge cutoff 2026-09-20
January 1-September 20, 2026: monetary tightening, energy security, trade restrictions, AI financing and divergent growth; five leading market themes.
Archived context covering 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-20. Its recorded scope includes monetary policy and rates; geopolitics energy and shipping; trade and industrial policy. Selected highlights reflect the analysis cutoff, not current world conditions.
Show moreShow less
- File size
- 84.8K bytes
- Words
- 12.4K words
- Characters
- 84.8K characters
- Est. tokens (characters ÷ 4)
- 21.2K tokens
Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00%; ECB hike is in force and BOJ increase starts September 24. Markets through September 18, bitcoin through September 19.
| Selected highlights from this archived snapshot | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Renewed monetary tightening amid persistent inflation | 2026-01-30 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
| Iran/Hormuz conflict and wider energy-security disruption | 2026-02-28 | ONGOING |
| Tariff legal reset and strategic supply restrictions | 2026-02-20 | ACTIVE POLICY REGIME |
Representative Sources of the Context File
And more sources from the retained context package.
Fundamental Context Passed as Input to the Models
Time range: Annual fiscal periods: 2018-12-31–2025-12-31, 8 periods; Quarterly fiscal periods: 2023-09-30–2026-06-30, 12 periods.
Currencies cited: USD (quote USD; primary reporting USD; converted/valuation USD).
Show moreShow less
Income statement
9 fieldsdepreciationAndAmortization · ebit · ebitda · grossProfit · +5 more fields
Balance sheet
12 fieldscash · commonStockSharesOutstanding · longTermDebt · netDebt · +8 more fields
Cash flow
5 fieldscapitalExpenditures · dividendsPaid · freeCashFlow · salePurchaseOfStock · +1 more field
End of the paywalled preview
The excerpt from Deep Dive: detailed analysis to this notice is the simplified paywalled content included on this page. A signed-in, verified account with the required subscription provides the full interactive interface and the additional research, datasets and tools listed below.
Those additional materials are not included in this preview and cannot be revealed by removing its visual restrictions.
Additional with full access
Individual AI Advisor reports
- Investment theses
- Bull and bear scenarios and alpha signals
- Drivers, headwinds, risks and opportunities
- Quarterly forecast rationale
- Advisor research references and configuration
Additional datasets and interactive tools
- Interactive forecast comparisons
- Available detailed financial statements
- Market history and corporate-action adjustments
- Eligible historical publication workspaces
Explore complete public research examples
These public assets show the complete AI Consensus research. Their findings concern those assets, not this report.