14 advisor opinions Base Subscription Required
BigBear.ai AI Forecast Summary
Unlock the rating distributions, return ranges and advisor comparison with a Base subscription.
Checking your access...
Browse Free Assets1 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 3 Sell All 2 Partial Sell 2 Neutral 1 Buy 6 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -19.1% to +57.7%
5 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 9 Sell All 1 Partial Sell 3 Neutral 1 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -63.0% to +164.9%
Calculated from End of Date $2.22
What do advisors disagree on
The decisive disagreement centers on whether the Ask Sage and Pangiam acquisitions represent a structural pivot toward high-margin software or an optical illusion masking sub-scale consulting economics. Bullish perspectives argue that accredited classified enclaves create insurmountable regulatory moats that will drive gross margins past 40% and unlock rapid cash break-even. In contrast, bearish and disciplined consensus analyses emphasize that organic revenue contracted 6% in Q2 2026, while ongoing cash burn of $73.8 million necessitates continuous share printing under the 100-million shelf. This debate will resolve when fiscal 2027 audited statements demonstrate whether organic software revenue can scale without accelerating administrative overhead.
Compare all 14 opinions1 Year & 5 Year ratings, targets & returns · Sorted by 5 Year price return
| Advisor | Model | Research | 1 Year | 5 Year | Full Report | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | ||||
| Niccolo Machiavelli AI The Insider Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $3.50 | +57.7% | $5.88 | +164.9% | Full report | ||||
| Ray Dalio AI The Strategist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $2.42 | +9.0% | $2.91 | +31.0% | Full report | ||||
| Sherlock Holmes AI The Whistleblower Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $3.05 | +37.4% | $2.90 | +30.8% | Full report | ||||
| J.P. Morgan AI The Titan Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $2.73 | +23.1% | $2.86 | +28.8% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Claude Opus 5 | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $2.31 | +4.2% | $2.29 | +3.2% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | GPT-6 Astra | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $2.00 | -10.0% | $1.79 | -19.2% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $2.65 | +19.5% | $1.76 | -20.8% | Full report | ||||
| Elon Musk AI The Visionary Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $2.30 | +3.5% | $1.65 | -25.5% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $2.52 | +13.6% | $1.50 | -32.3% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $2.47 | +11.4% | $1.46 | -34.3% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $2.24 | +0.9% | $1.24 | -44.2% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $2.16 | -2.6% | $1.05 | -52.8% | Full report | ||||
| Michael Burry AI The Vulture Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $1.80 | -19.1% | $0.88 | -60.2% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $2.18 | -1.7% | $0.82 | -63.0% | Full report | ||||
Prices, dates & return assumptions
1 Year and 5 Year identify the original published checkpoints. Current returns compare the dated close with each fixed target over its remaining horizon. Original quarterly tables use the publication-time anchor. Targets and observed prices share a split-adjusted basis.
Ratings use the shared volatility-adjusted calculation.
Ranges and rating distributions use matching currencies, price bases and target dates. Missing or expired checkpoints are excluded; targets are never extrapolated. Shared frameworks and models can produce correlated opinions.
BigBear.ai Stock Analysis & Forecast — Universal Investor The Polymath Framework on Claude Opus 5 Model
Universal Investor AI · The Polymath Framework
5 Year Rating
5 Year Price Return
+3.2%
Framework Description & Key Record Dates
Investment Framework
The Polymath Framework: Eight-Lens Investment Analysis Framework
Analysis Framework Description: Select the lenses with the greatest explanatory power, resolve their disagreements across horizons, and connect the evidence to a consistent thesis, scenario path, and verdict.
- Ownership and value: examine economic rights, competitive advantage, capital allocation, and the price paid.
- Regimes and constraints: connect credit, liquidity, policy, demand, and physical bottlenecks to the asset.
- Innovation and adaptation: test adoption economics, AI and robotics exposure, substitution, and value capture.
- Forensics and incentives: reconcile accounting, cash conversion, dilution, governance, and missing evidence.
- Expectations and reflexivity: distinguish changes in fundamentals from changes in narratives and valuation.
- Probabilities and resilience: use base rates, competing scenarios, catalysts, and the capacity to survive the wait.
- Power and the rules of the game: assess political interests, regulatory influence, protection, and dependency.
- Industry structure and consolidation: identify pricing power, chokepoints, alliances, and the economics of integration.
- Model Producer:
- Anthropic
- Model Version:
- Claude Opus 5
- Mode Used:
- Researcher
- Input Data:
- Input records not available
- Forecast Target Date:
- Latest Known Price Date for Return Estimate Refresh:
- Forecast Published On:
- Forecast Generated On:
- Model knowledge cutoff:
- Supplied Context Data, Prices & Events Cutoff:
- Not recorded
Return calculation details
Current returns use the observed price and remaining time to the fixed published target. The quarterly table retains the original forecast anchor.
Full advisor report Chart, analysis, and sources
BigBear.ai: Historical Prices & Published Forecast
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
BigBear.ai: Quarterly Price Forecasts & Scenarios
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
Price targets, price returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Price returns are cumulative from the original forecast anchor dated 2026-09-18; they exclude dividends. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Price return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.55 | -9.0% | Q3 print lands against a wide guidance band while the 424B5 shelf hangs over the tape. Tight financing conditions after the September Fed hike compress a 10x-sales multiple; dilution fear dominates contract headlines. | |
| $2.68 | -4.4% | FY2026 results confirm roughly 17% growth and further gross-margin expansion, with FY2027 guidance framed optimistically. Relief rally follows, but the residual 2026 notes retirement and share-count disclosure cap the bounce. | |
| $2.46 | -12.1% | An acquisition financed partly with stock reintroduces the dilution arithmetic. Investors rebase per-share revenue rather than enterprise revenue, and the multiple compresses despite unchanged operational trajectory and defense demand. | |
| $2.31 | -17.4% | Backlog conversion slips as appropriations timing pushes obligations right. Book-to-bill below one for consecutive quarters undercuts the acceleration narrative while yields remain elevated, reinforcing the derating of long-duration unprofitable AI names. | |
| $2.52 | -9.9% | A sizeable classified or program-of-record award, plus visible Ask Sage seat expansion across defense enclaves, sparks a sharp narrative-driven rebound typical of this retail-heavy float. Fundamentals improve less than price. | |
| $2.35 | -16.2% | FY2027 results show mid-teens growth with operating losses still near $100M annualised. The gap between enterprise progress and per-share economics reasserts itself as the prior quarter's enthusiasm fades. | |
| $2.23 | -20.4% | Competitive pressure from Palantir and venture-funded defense software erodes win rates on recompetes. Pricing concessions cap gross-margin expansion near 36%, and the software multiple thesis loses supporting evidence. | |
| $2.36 | -15.6% | Consolidation speculation in defense software lifts the sector. With debt eliminated and tangible book near $400M, BBAI trades as a plausible target, drawing event-driven buyers into a thin float. | |
| $2.20 | -21.6% | No bid materialises and a further capital raise funds integration costs. Share count expansion toward 600 million dilutes per-share revenue even as consolidated revenue approaches $200M, pressuring the multiple further. | |
| $2.28 | -18.4% | Gross margin crossing the mid-thirties and adjusted EBITDA approaching breakeven provide the first credible operating-leverage evidence. Modest rerate as the bear case on solvency is definitively retired. | |
| $2.15 | -23.3% | A defense budget reprioritisation toward munitions and hardware slows software obligations. Revenue guidance trims, and investors discount the recurring-revenue transition timeline by another year. | |
| $2.25 | -19.5% | Accredited generative-AI seat growth accelerates as classified enclave deployments mature, lifting recurring mix. Sentiment improves alongside a softer rate environment, supporting valuation for unprofitable growth names. | |
| $2.16 | -22.7% | Year-end guidance for 2030 implies continued sub-20% growth. With the platform premium unproven, the sales multiple settles nearer six times, offsetting the year's operational gains on a per-share basis. | |
| $2.23 | -20.4% | First quarters of sustained positive adjusted EBITDA arrive as revenue clears $230M with mid-thirties gross margin. Valuation stabilises because earnings power finally anchors an otherwise narrative-priced equity. | |
| $2.14 | -23.6% | Free cash flow remains negative after working capital and integration costs. Investors distinguish adjusted profitability from cash generation, and the stock gives back part of the prior quarter's advance. | |
| $2.23 | -20.5% | A multi-year program-of-record renewal extends revenue visibility, lifting backlog durability. Contract-vehicle incumbency proves worth more than growth rate, drawing valuation-sensitive institutional buyers into the name. | |
| $2.18 | -22.1% | Mature-phase repricing continues: growth normalises toward low teens and the market applies a government-services-plus-software hybrid multiple rather than a pure AI premium. Modest drift lower. | |
| $2.25 | -19.8% | Positive operating cash flow for a full year confirms the business model finally self-funds. Dilution pressure abates as the ATM goes unused, improving the per-share arithmetic investors watch. | |
| $2.22 | -20.6% | Range-bound trading as valuation converges near five times sales on roughly $280M revenue. Neither a rerate catalyst nor a solvency threat exists; price tracks slow fundamental compounding. | |
| $2.29 | -18.2% | Steady defense AI demand and a stabilised share count let modest earnings growth accrue to shareholders. The stock ends the horizon below today's price, with the derating largely complete. |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
BigBear.ai: Investment Thesis Base Case
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelThe central tension is that BigBear.ai is getting better as a business while getting more expensive as a claim. Revenue reaccelerated to 13% growth, gross margin expanded 781 basis points, and debt was effectively eliminated — genuine operational progress. Yet the equity trades at 10.2x trailing sales with negative $73.8M free cash flow, and the financing model requires issuing shares into that multiple to fund acquisitions. Base case: enterprise value grows modestly as defense AI demand holds, while share count expands faster, leaving per-share value drifting lower toward a blend of tangible book and a rerated software multiple, punctuated by narrative-driven spikes.
- Anchor: TTM revenue $132M, gross margin 32.8%, operating loss $28.6M in Q2 2026 — breakeven needs roughly $220M revenue.
- Valuation link: 10.2x sales compresses toward 5-6x as growth proves mid-teens, offsetting revenue gains entirely.
- Cross-check: $400.9M tangible book, or $0.84 per share, floors downside well below today's price .
BigBear.ai: Scenarios & Signals
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBull Case
The bull case activates when accreditation converts into recurring seats faster than the share count grows. Ask Sage ARR scaling past $100M by 2029 would push consolidated gross margin toward 45%, drag the company to EBITDA breakeven near $200M revenue, and convert the narrative premium into a defensible software multiple. Sustained defense appropriations and a disinflation-driven fall in the ten-year yield would amplify the rerate. In that combination, today's $2.80 looks cheap rather than stretched.
Bear Case
The bear case activates when growth disappoints while the printing press keeps running. A soft FY2027, book-to-bill persistently under one and a forced equity raise at depressed prices would expand the count past 600 million, trigger an Ask Sage impairment, and strip the platform narrative that justifies 10x sales. With a five-percent ten-year yield offering no valuation support, the multiple collapses toward tangible book near $1 per share. Operational competence would not rescue the per-share claim.
Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime: High
Greed and Fear Index: +22 / 100 (Greed)
Cycle Position: Reversal
The thesis is unwinding and reflexive decline is underway.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
The crowd treats BigBear.ai as a cheap call option on defense AI — Palantir's little brother with a clean balance sheet. That belief is anchored on liquidity headlines: $410M cash, debt effectively gone, backlog near $270M . What it ignores is the $4.00 average target against $2.80, GuruFocus's $1.31 fair value , and a 10.2x sales multiple funded by continuous share issuance.
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
The crowd overestimates these shares, though less egregiously than a year ago. The blind spot is unit-of-account: investors track enterprise metrics — backlog, contract wins, cash — while value accrues per share, and the share count went from roughly 275 million to 479.5 million through recapitalisation, with a 424B5 modelling another 100 million . Corroborating evidence: Q2 backlog fell from about $282M to $269.6M , so book-to-bill was below one while the dilution machine kept running.
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
The catalyst is the next equity raise priced against a soft Q3 or Q4 2026 print. When a follow-on lands and consensus models finally rebase revenue per share rather than revenue, the multiple compresses. First observable sign: a prospectus supplement or ATM disclosure alongside unchanged FY2027 growth language.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
The macro wind is in its face. A 3.75%-4.00% policy rate and a five-percent ten-year yield punish long-duration, cash-burning equities most, and BBAI's 10.2x sales multiple is pure duration. Offsetting partially, the energy-security shock sustains defense appropriations, so demand is resilient even as the valuation channel tightens.
BigBear.ai: Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBase-Case Forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Base-case positive forces
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense TECH Budget WIND AT ITS BACK | Sector And Industry | +18% | +45% | Follow the money: Hormuz disruption, Red Sea threats and border-security spending keep national-security AI budgets expanding while discretionary IT stagnates. BigBear.ai holds prime access through the Army GFIM production contract worth $165.15M , a Navy SeaPort NxG prime IDIQ and classified intelligence-community work. This sustains a $270M-plus backlog and underwrites the mid-teens revenue growth management targets, though contract sizes stay small relative to a $1.34B market capitalisation. |
| ASK SAGE Accreditation AS A MOAT | Innovation And Product | +12% | +38% | The scarce asset bought for roughly $250M was not code but clearance: Ask Sage carries FedRAMP High, Impact Level 5/6 and Top Secret authorisation with zero-trust controls , accreditation that takes competitors years to replicate. That authorisation converts commodity model access into billable, recurring government AI seats at software gross margins. Evidence is already visible in Q2 2026 gross margin expanding 781 basis points to 32.8% year over year . |
| DEBT Erased Runway Purchased | Capital Allocation | +9.0% | +15% | The full voluntary conversion of the $124.6M 2029 notes cut note-related debt from roughly $142M to about $17M , leaving $409.8M of cash and investments against roughly $22M quarterly operating burn . This removes refinancing risk at a 5% ten-year yield, funds M&A without covenant constraint, and means solvency is not the bear case here. The optionality persists for years; the shareholders paid for it in shares, not interest. |
| Services TO Software Margin MIX Shift | Operational Efficiency | +7.0% | +30% | Gross margin moving from 25.0% to 32.8% year over year is the first corroborated evidence that product revenue, Pangiam threat detection and Ask Sage seats are displacing labour-heavy integration work. Each incremental margin point compounds against a roughly fixed $16.75M research base and reduces the revenue level required to reach EBITDA breakeven. The trend should persist while product mix rises, but service-contract recompetes cap the ceiling near 40%. |
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Base-case negative forces
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE Share Printing Flywheel | Capital Allocation | -22% | -5.0% | Here is the arithmetic that decides this stock: the 424B5 models selling 100,000,000 shares at $2.83, lifting tangible book to $1.17 while diluting buyers $1.66 per share , on top of a count already at 479.5 million after the note conversion added 38.1 million . An ATM with Cantor stands permanently open . Enterprise revenue can compound at 15% while revenue per share stagnates. |
| FIVE Percent Treasuries Versus TEN Times | Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial | -20% | +0.0% | The Fed's move to 3.75%-4.00% and a US ten-year at 4.998% on 2026-09-18 are the discount-rate hammer on a zero-earnings, long-duration equity trading at 10.2x trailing sales with negative $73.8M free cash flow. No company action offsets this channel. With median dots at 4.1% for 2026 and 2027, the multiple compression is structural rather than a passing sentiment episode, easing only if disinflation resumes late in the horizon. |
| Palantir's Shadow Anduril's Speed | Competitive Positioning | -14% | -25% | The comparison is unforgiving: Palantir ended Q1 2026 with $11.8B remaining deal value, up 98% , while BigBear.ai books low-double-digit growth with backlog slipping from roughly $282M to $269.6M between Q1 and Q2 2026 — book-to-bill below one. Primes and venture-funded challengers bid the same mission sets with larger engineering benches, compressing award win-rates and pricing on recompetes across the horizon. |
| Appropriations Timing Quarterly Whiplas | Political And Geopolitical | -8.0% | -12% | For a prime this small, a continuing resolution or funding lapse is not background noise but a revenue event; the February 2026 DHS funding lapse is already in the record. Guidance of $135M-$165M implies a second half between $64M and $79M, a band wide enough to make conversion timing, not demand, the swing factor. Expect recurring quarters where obligations slip and the stock gaps on the print. |
Risks & Opportunities
Top Risks / Downside Scenarios
Lower-probability downside scenarios outside the base-case forecast.
Unlock the risk analysis
Sign in with eligible access to read risks, opportunities and the remaining advisor reports.