14 advisor opinions Base Subscription Required
Palantir Technologies AI Forecast Summary
Unlock the rating distributions, return ranges and advisor comparison with a Base subscription.
Checking your access...
Browse Free Assets1 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 10 Sell All 1 Partial Sell 2 Buy 1 Strong Buy
Returns range: from -23.3% to +21.8%
5 Year Ratings & Returns ()
Ratings: 7 Partial Sell 5 Neutral 2 Buy
Returns range: from -6.3% to +66.5%
Calculated from End of Date $160.38
What do advisors disagree on
The decisive analytical debate centers on valuation elasticity versus multiple duration gravity. Bulls argue that irreplaceable defense entrenchment, bootcamp sales velocity, and elite 50% free cash flow margins justify sustaining historic enterprise software premiums. Conversely, valuation-sensitive analysts assert that in a 5% interest-rate regime, mathematical multiple contraction toward 25-35 times earnings will completely absorb five years of earnings growth, leaving equity holders with stagnant returns. Resolving this tension requires tracking sequential commercial net dollar retention alongside benchmark bond yields across 2027.
Compare all 14 opinions1 Year & 5 Year ratings, targets & returns · Sorted by 5 Year price return
| Advisor | Model | Research | 1 Year | 5 Year | Full Report | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | Target date | Rating | Price target | Price return | ||||
| J.P. Morgan AI The Titan Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $177.20 | +10.5% | $267.07 | +66.5% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Claude Opus 5 | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $195.34 | +21.8% | $255.00 | +59.0% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $158.54 | -1.1% | $202.28 | +26.1% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $122.96 | -23.3% | $200.71 | +25.1% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $144.61 | -9.8% | $193.82 | +20.8% | Full report | ||||
| Niccolo Machiavelli AI The Insider Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $137.15 | -14.5% | $187.90 | +17.2% | Full report | ||||
| Ray Dalio AI The Strategist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $140.10 | -12.6% | $185.93 | +15.9% | Full report | ||||
| Elon Musk AI The Visionary Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $145.39 | -9.3% | $181.16 | +13.0% | Full report | ||||
| Sherlock Holmes AI The Whistleblower Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $155.33 | -3.1% | $172.40 | +7.5% | Full report | ||||
| Warren Buffett AI The Value Seeker Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $153.55 | -4.3% | $163.61 | +2.0% | Full report | ||||
| Superintelligence AI The Anthropologist Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $137.15 | -14.5% | $163.43 | +1.9% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | GPT-6 Astra | Researcher Mode with Web Search Used | $145.17 | -9.5% | $156.62 | -2.3% | Full report | ||||
| Michael Burry AI The Vulture Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Researcher Mode but Web Search Wasn't Used | $132.59 | -17.3% | $155.44 | -3.1% | Full report | ||||
| Universal Investor AI The Polymath Framework | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Thinker Mode with Web Search Disabled | $174.62 | +8.9% | $150.25 | -6.3% | Full report | ||||
Prices, dates & return assumptions
1 Year and 5 Year identify the original published checkpoints. Current returns compare the dated close with each fixed target over its remaining horizon. Original quarterly tables use the publication-time anchor. Targets and observed prices share a split-adjusted basis.
Ratings use the shared volatility-adjusted calculation.
Ranges and rating distributions use matching currencies, price bases and target dates. Missing or expired checkpoints are excluded; targets are never extrapolated. Shared frameworks and models can produce correlated opinions.
Palantir Technologies Stock Analysis & Forecast — Universal Investor The Polymath Framework on Claude Opus 5 Model
Universal Investor AI · The Polymath Framework
5 Year Rating
5 Year Price Return
+59.0%
Framework Description & Key Record Dates
Investment Framework
The Polymath Framework: Eight-Lens Investment Analysis Framework
Analysis Framework Description: Select the lenses with the greatest explanatory power, resolve their disagreements across horizons, and connect the evidence to a consistent thesis, scenario path, and verdict.
- Ownership and value: examine economic rights, competitive advantage, capital allocation, and the price paid.
- Regimes and constraints: connect credit, liquidity, policy, demand, and physical bottlenecks to the asset.
- Innovation and adaptation: test adoption economics, AI and robotics exposure, substitution, and value capture.
- Forensics and incentives: reconcile accounting, cash conversion, dilution, governance, and missing evidence.
- Expectations and reflexivity: distinguish changes in fundamentals from changes in narratives and valuation.
- Probabilities and resilience: use base rates, competing scenarios, catalysts, and the capacity to survive the wait.
- Power and the rules of the game: assess political interests, regulatory influence, protection, and dependency.
- Industry structure and consolidation: identify pricing power, chokepoints, alliances, and the economics of integration.
- Model Producer:
- Anthropic
- Model Version:
- Claude Opus 5
- Mode Used:
- Researcher
- Input Data:
- Input records not available
- Forecast Target Date:
- Latest Known Price Date for Return Estimate Refresh:
- Forecast Published On:
- Forecast Generated On:
- Model knowledge cutoff:
- Supplied Context Data, Prices & Events Cutoff:
- Not recorded
Return calculation details
Current returns use the observed price and remaining time to the fixed published target. The quarterly table retains the original forecast anchor.
Full advisor report Chart, analysis, and sources
Palantir Technologies: Historical Prices & Published Forecast
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
- Observed price
- Published advisor forecast
Palantir Technologies: Quarterly Price Forecasts & Scenarios
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 model
Price targets, price returns and complete scenario reasoning
Forecast prices in USD. Price returns are cumulative from the original forecast anchor dated 2026-09-18; they exclude dividends. Swipe horizontally to read every column.
| Quarter | Forecast | Price return | Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $185 | +4.0% | The November 9 print clears a guide near $2.16 billion and nudges FY2026 above $8.2 billion, but a five-percent ten-year yield caps the re-rating. Beat-and-raise buys a modest advance, not a breakout. | |
| $196 | +10.2% | February's fourth-quarter report delivers roughly 80% full-year growth and initial FY2027 guidance above $12.5 billion. Momentum buyers return, though the guide's implied deceleration limits enthusiasm and the shares stall below the 2025 high. | |
| $186 | +4.7% | Deceleration becomes visible as comparisons harden against the 93% base. With the Fed still restrictive and term premium elevated, long-duration software de-rates first; Palantir's 60x forward sales makes it the obvious funding source. | |
| $195 | +10.0% | Second-quarter results confirm US commercial still compounding above 70% and free cash flow tracking toward $7 billion annualised. Cash generation outruns the multiple's decline this quarter, producing recovery without regime change. | |
| $201 | +13.3% | Allied defense appropriations for 2028 firm up sovereign-AI line items, supporting the government segment. Offsetting this, inflation persistence keeps cuts postponed, so gains remain incremental rather than trend-establishing. | |
| $213 | +20.1% | FY2027 closes near $13 billion revenue with GAAP profitability in every quarter and a flat share count. The per-share arithmetic finally rewards holders, lifting shares as compression slows against faster earnings delivery. | |
| $205 | +15.3% | Agentic competitors compress deal pricing in mid-market commercial accounts, and renewal cycles lengthen. Cancellable backlog draws scrutiny from analysts, prompting a modest multiple reset despite unchanged headline growth. | |
| $213 | +19.9% | NGC2-linked programme expansion and continued 45%-plus growth reassure the market. Free cash flow near $9 billion annualised makes the yield argument less absurd, drawing incremental institutional buyers back. | |
| $219 | +23.5% | US election-cycle fiscal uncertainty introduces defense-budget hesitancy, partly offset by commercial strength. The stock grinds higher on cash generation while investors await clarity on procurement priorities for 2029. | |
| $230 | +29.6% | FY2028 results show revenue near $19 billion at sustained 55% cash margins. The forward multiple has fallen below 25x sales, a level where valuation stops being the dominant objection for generalist funds. | |
| $216 | +21.9% | Growth decelerates through the 35% threshold, triggering the narrative shift from hypergrowth to premium software. Momentum holders rotate out; the de-rating outpaces the quarter's earnings contribution. | |
| $225 | +26.7% | Stabilising after the growth-tier reclassification, shares recover as buybacks finally scale against a $12 billion-plus cash pile. Capital return becomes a genuine per-share lever rather than the cosmetic offset it was in 2026. | |
| $232 | +30.5% | Enterprise AI budgets normalise into recurring IT spend, favouring embedded incumbents. Palantir's ontology lock-in supports renewals; gains are steady but unspectacular as the multiple continues its structural descent. | |
| $241 | +35.8% | FY2029 results near $25 billion revenue with free cash flow above $13 billion. The valuation now rests on visible cash rather than 2035 projections, a healthier but far less explosive basis for returns. | |
| $229 | +29.0% | A mid-cycle macro wobble — credit tightening or renewed energy disruption — hits high-multiple names disproportionately. Palantir's beta to risk sentiment remains elevated even at a compressed valuation. | |
| $238 | +34.1% | Recovery driven by sovereign and defense renewals plus international commercial expansion beyond the current 74% US concentration. Geographic diversification reduces the political-dependency discount embedded in the multiple. | |
| $245 | +38.2% | Growth settles near 28% with margins intact. Shares behave increasingly like a high-quality compounder, tracking earnings growth minus continued modest multiple contraction toward large-cap software norms. | |
| $255 | +43.7% | FY2030 delivers roughly $32 billion revenue and $18 billion free cash flow. Sustained buybacks against a stable 2.7 billion share count make per-share growth visibly exceed enterprise growth for the first time. | |
| $248 | +39.4% | Late-horizon competitive maturity appears as agent orchestration commoditises at the lower end. Pricing pressure trims incremental margins, prompting a mild valuation adjustment rather than a thesis break. | |
| $255 | +43.5% | The five-year arc closes with Palantir established as critical operational infrastructure at roughly 18x sales. Returns arrive from compounded cash generation, having been substantially offset throughout by the multiple's long descent. |
Show remaining 18 quartersShow first 2 quarters only
All 20 quarters are displayed in the table above.
Palantir Technologies: Investment Thesis Base Case
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelThe central tension is not whether Palantir executes — it plainly does — but whether shareholders get paid for it. Through 2026 the market ran the experiment for us: earnings roughly doubled, the stock went nowhere, and the forward multiple collapsed from the inside. Extend that mechanism across five years and you get a business compounding toward $35–40 billion of revenue with 55%-plus cash margins, while the multiple bleeds from 74x sales toward the high teens. Returns exist, but they are the residual between two powerful opposing forces, and the ride is violent.
- FY2026 guided revenue of $8.15 billion with adjusted free cash flow of $4.5–4.7 billion anchors the model.
- At roughly 56x forward sales today, compression toward 18x by 2031 offsets most revenue compounding.
- Cross-check: $600–700 billion enterprise value across about 2.7 billion shares implies $220–260 per share.
Palantir Technologies: Scenarios & Signals
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBull Case
The bull case activates when the discount rate and the defense budget move in the same direction at once. Energy-security normalisation pulls inflation back toward target, the Fed reverses toward cuts, and the 10-year falls below 4% — precisely when allied sovereign-AI appropriations turn Palantir's control-plane positioning into obligated multi-year revenue. Growth holds above 50% into 2028 rather than halving, the multiple stops compressing, and per-share cash flow compounds against a stable share count. Shares clear $350.
Bear Case
The bear case activates the moment one quarter merely meets guidance. With consensus already at the guide and no valuation floor beneath 74x sales, an in-line print triggers forced de-rating; deceleration headlines then validate the agentic-substitution critique, enterprise buyers delay renewals of cancellable contracts, and a defense budget rotation removes the government floor. Persistent insider selling supplies the narrative. Compression and decelerating growth compound rather than offset, and the shares revisit the $110–120 zone seen in early 2026.
Behavioral Alpha Signals
Sentiment, repricing cycle, crowd narrative, catalyst, and macro alignment.Expected Volatility Regime: High
Greed and Fear Index: +42 / 100 (Greed)
Cycle Position: Overshoot
Speculation has pushed the narrative beyond fundamentals.
What does Media Tell? (Crowd Consensus)
Consensus treats execution as settled and debates only the multiple: twenty analysts rate it Buy with a $204 mean target and a $180–255 dispersion band . The anchoring bias is the 2025 high of $207 — the crowd assumes flat-to-down 2026 is a pause before reclaiming it, and quietly accepts valuation frameworks discounting 2035 EBITDA as a legitimate anchor.
What Crowds Get Wrong? (Alpha/Value Gap)
The crowd slightly overestimates what these shares can return, even while underestimating the business. Two overlooked facts point in opposite directions: the share count has stalled at roughly 2.57 billion , materially improving per-share math, yet the stock stayed flat through 2026 while earnings doubled — proof the market is resolving the tension via compression, not appreciation. At 74x sales, superb operating results are already the required condition, not the upside. Fair-to-rich, with negative skew.
When will Value Gap Repricing Happen? (Repricing Catalyst)
The February 2027 fourth-quarter print, when initial FY2027 guidance makes deceleration numerically visible for the first time. If a strong beat is paired with a guide implying sub-55% growth and the shares fail to hold the gap higher, that failure is the first observable sign the market has repriced growth duration.
How is Asset Influenced by Macro Regime?
The macro wind is squarely in its face through the transmission that matters most: discounting. With the Fed at 3.75%–4.00%, the 10-year near 5% and the energy shock keeping inflation sticky, an asset yielding 0.74% on trailing free cash flow is the purest long-duration exposure in large-cap software. Thesis sensitivity to a dovish regime change is extreme.
Palantir Technologies: Positive & Negative Factors, Risks & Opportunities
Analyzed by The Polymath Framework using the Opus 5 modelBase-Case Forces
Top Drivers / Tailwinds
Base-case positive forces
Structural or operating forces that support this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Driver / Tailwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIP Becomes THE Enterprise System OF REC | Competitive Positioning | +55% | +190% | US commercial revenue grew 149% year over year to $764 million in Q2 2026 , with net dollar retention near 157% — existing accounts are expanding faster than new logos arrive. The ontology layer embeds itself in operational decision workflows, which raises switching costs once deployments move from pilot to production . Management guides US commercial above $3.424 billion for 2026 ; this compounding is the core earnings engine. |
| Privileged Access TO THE Defense Wallet | Political And Geopolitical | +26% | +70% | Government still supplies roughly 54% of revenue , and the procurement channel is unusually privileged: an internal August 2026 Pentagon memo proposed effectively sole-source funding up to $244 million through 2028 , while the UK MoD awarded £240 million without tender . Allied rearmament budgets and the NGC2 data-layer role convert political alignment into multi-year obligated spending. This advantage persists while incumbent decision-makers retain it. |
| Sixty Percent Margins ON NEAR ZERO Capex | Operational Efficiency | +20% | +48% | Q2 2026 adjusted operating income of $1.194 billion and adjusted free cash flow of $1.220 billion both cleared 60% margins , a Rule of 40 score management put at 155% . The mechanism is deliberate headcount restraint against forward-deployed leverage, with capex under 1% of revenue. Incremental revenue converts to cash at extraordinary rates, and this structure should hold while deployment automation improves. |
| Dilution Treadmill Finally Slowing | Capital Allocation | +9.0% | +9.0% | Diluted weighted-average shares moved from 2,450.8 million in FY2024 to 2,565.2 million in FY2025, then essentially paused at 2,568.7 million in Q2 2026 . That stall is the most under-appreciated positive in the file: per-share economics now track enterprise economics far more closely. With $9.2 billion in cash and Treasuries and zero debt, interest income further supports earnings while financing costs stay at zero. |
Top Frictions / Headwinds
Base-case negative forces
Expected frictions that can slow, cap, or damage this advisor thesis. Base-case means above 70% probability of occurrence. Probabilities are model estimates; unquantified forces retain their published group.
Scroll to view all columns
| Friction / Headwind | Category | Est. stock-price impact | Est. earnings impact | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration Crushed BY A FIVE Percent Tenor | Macroeconomic And Macrofinancial | -58% | +0.0% | The evidence chain is blunt: 74.2x trailing sales, 147x EV/EBITDA and a 0.74% trailing free-cash-flow yield, priced against a US 10-year at 4.998% on 2026-09-18 and a Fed median dot of 4.1% for both 2026 and 2027. Bull frameworks explicitly discount 2035 EBITDA , which concedes near-term cash cannot support the price. Every basis point of term premium compresses that multiple mechanically. |
| THE LAW OF Large Numbers Arrives | Sector And Industry | -26% | -14% | Growth of 93% on a $1.94 billion quarterly base cannot repeat; FY2026 guidance of $8.150–8.158 billion sets a comparison base that makes 2027 deceleration arithmetic rather than opinion. Karp himself framed visibility as roughly another 18 months . When reported growth halves toward 40%, the narrative shifts from hypergrowth to premium software, and the multiple the crowd tolerates falls faster than earnings rise. |
| PLUG AND PLAY Agents Bypass THE Integrat | Competitive Positioning | -19% | -13% | Michael Burry's critique moved past valuation to moat, arguing nimbler agentic vendors bypass Palantir's high-touch integration model . Microsoft's Azure AI stack and ServiceNow's control-tower positioning attack the same budget line . Compounding the exposure, much of the $13.1 billion remaining deal value is characterised as cancellable , and federal contracts carry termination-for-convenience clauses , so backlog is coverage, not commitment. |
| Insiders SELL Buybacks ARE Cosmetic | Management And Governance | -13% | -9.0% | 2025 stock-based compensation of roughly $684 million dwarfed $75 million of buybacks , and trailing net buyback yield is a rounding error at +0.01%. Thiel entities sold 2,000,000 shares in March 2026 and Karp sold $86 million in August ; Thiel's stake fell from about 8% to 3% . No open-market insider buying occurred across a 35% drawdown — that absence is the sharper datapoint. |
Risks & Opportunities
Top Risks / Downside Scenarios
Lower-probability downside scenarios outside the base-case forecast.
Unlock the risk analysis
Sign in with eligible access to read risks, opportunities and the remaining advisor reports.